A Spectroscopic Survey of Redshift 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 3.0 Galaxies in the GOODS-North Field: Survey Description, Catalogs, and Properties

By Naveen A. Reddy, C. Steidel, D. Erb, A. Shapley, M. Pettini. 2006

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the results of a spectroscopic survey with LRIS-B on Keck of more than 280 star-forming galaxies and AGNs at redshifts 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 3.0 in the GOODS-N field. Candidates are selected by their UnGℛ colors using the ``BM/BX'' criteria to target redshift 1.4 ≲ z ≲ 2.5 galaxies and the LBG criteria to target redshift z ~ 3 galaxies; combined these samples account for ~25%-30% of the ℛ and Ks band counts to ℛ = 25.5 and Ks(AB) = 24.4, respectively. The 212 BM/BX galaxies and 74 LBGs constitute the largest spectroscopic sample of galaxies at z > 1.4 in GOODS-N. Extensive multiwavelength data allow us to investigate the stellar populations, stellar masses, bolometric luminosities (Lbol), and extinction of z ~ 2 galaxies. Deep Chandra and Spitzer data indicate that the sample includes galaxies with a wide range in Lbol (≃1010 to >1012 L☉) and 4 orders of magnitude in dust obscuration (Lbol/LUV). The sample includes galaxies with a large dynamic range in evolutionary state, from very young galaxies (ages ≃50 Myr) with small stellar masses (M* ≃ 109 M☉) to evolved galaxies with stellar masses comparable to the most massive galaxies at these redshifts (M* > 1011 M☉). Spitzer data indicate that the optical sample includes some fraction of the obscured AGN population at high redshifts: at least 3 of 11 AGNs in the z > 1.4 sample are undetected in the deep X-ray data but exhibit power-law SEDs longward of ~2 μm (rest frame) indicative of obscured AGNs. The results of our survey indicate that rest-frame UV selection and spectroscopy presently constitute the most timewise efficient method of culling large samples of high-redshift galaxies with a wide range in intrinsic properties, and the data presented here will add significantly to the multiwavelength legacy of GOODS.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/784d4052b30d460e1200e772b2f57825f4843b5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. R. Dav'e
  5. R. Somerville
  6. M. Franx
  7. C. Conroy
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. M. Franx
  3. C. Conroy
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. A. Dekel
  8. L. Hernquist

Citations in the corpus