LARGE AREA SURVEY FOR z = 7 GALAXIES IN SDF AND GOODS-N: IMPLICATIONS FOR GALAXY FORMATION AND COSMIC REIONIZATION

By M. Ouchi, B. Mobasher, K. Shimasaku, H. Ferguson, M. Fall, Yoshiaki Ono, N. Kashikawa, T. Morokuma, K. Nakajima, S. Okamura and 3 more. 2009

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results of our large area survey for z′-band dropout galaxies at z = 7 in a 1568 arcmin2 sky area covering the SDF and GOODS-N fields. Combining our ultra-deep Subaru/Suprime-Cam z′- and y-band (λeff = 1 μm) images with legacy data of Subaru and Hubble Space Telescope, we have identified 22 bright z-dropout galaxies down to y = 26, one of which has a spectroscopic redshift of z = 6.96 determined from Lyα emission. The z = 7 luminosity function yields the best-fit Schechter parameters of ϕ* = 0.69+2.62 −0.55 × 10−3 Mpc−3, M*UV = −20.10 ±  0.76 mag, and α = −1.72 ± 0.65, and indicates a decrease from z = 6 at a >95% confidence level. This decrease is beyond the cosmic variance in our two fields, which is estimated to be a factor of ≲2. We have found that the cosmic star formation rate density drops from the peak at z = 2–3 to z = 7 roughly by a factor of ∼10 but not larger than ∼100. A comparison with the reionization models suggests either that the universe could not be totally ionized by only galaxies at z = 7, or more likely that properties of galaxies at z = 7 are different from those at low redshifts having, e.g., a larger escape fraction (≳0.2), a lower metallicity, and/or a flatter initial mass function. Our SDF z-dropout galaxies appear to form 60 Mpc long filamentary structures, and the z = 6.96 galaxy with Lyα emission is located at the center of an overdense region consisting of four UV bright dropout candidates, which might suggest an existence of a well-developed ionized bubble at z = 7.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57a0351241f9a559dc8ddca5daeec21d3aea55f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. J. Dunlop
  6. M. Franx
  7. P. Oesch
  8. R. Bouwens

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. R. Bouwens
  3. J. Dunlop
  4. P. Oesch
  5. D. Stark
  6. G. Illingworth
  7. R. McLure
  8. M. Ouchi

In Instrumentation

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. P. V. van Dokkum
  3. M. Franx
  4. J. Dunlop
  5. R. Bouwens
  6. I. Labbé
  7. P. Oesch
  8. G. Illingworth

Citations in the corpus