SCHOOL SUBSIDIES FOR THE POOR: EVALUATING A MEXICAN STRATEGY FOR REDUCING POVERTY

By T. Schultz. 2001

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/77f755005cc88135f7324ff860c56fa8d3a7f453

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Conditional Cash Transfers and Their Impact on Child Work and Schooling: Evidence from the PROGRESA Program in Mexico (2001, background): “See Heckman, LaLonde, and Smith (1999).”
Long-term impacts of the oportunidades conditional cash transfer program on rural youth in Mexico (2005, unknown): “[33] Schultz, TP.”
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Demand- and Supply-Side Education Interventions: The Case of Progresa in Mexico (2004, unknown): “13 We do not include the full regression results; these can be found in Coady and Parker (2000) .”
PROGRESA and its Impacts on the Human Capital and Welfare of Households in Rural Mexico: A Synthesis of the Results of an Evaluation by IFPRI (2001, methodology): “This represents a proportional increase of boys from 5 to 8 percent and for girls 11 to 14 percent (Schultz, 2000a).”
Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Lessons from Latin America (2003, background): “9 For a comprehensive discussion of education impacts see Schultz, 2000a-c; Behrman, Sengupta and Todd, 2000; and IFPRI, 2002a. programs have demonstrated a positive effect on enrollment rates for both boys and girls.”
The Cost of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: A Comparative Analysis of Three Programs in Latin America (2004, background): “For education, the main effect of PROGRESA was to increase enrollment rates in secondary school (Schultz 2000; Behrman, Sengupta, and Todd 2001).”
Do Conditional Cash Transfers Affect Electoral Behavior? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Mexico (2013, methodology): “Families in 320 villages were randomly selected to receive benefits on September 1998, whereas 186 villages were excluded from the program until January 2000 (Schultz 2001).”
Progressing through PROGRESA: An Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment in Rural Mexico (2005, background): “The average total cash transfer is US$55 per month, which represents over a fifth of the average family income (Parker and Skoufias 2000).”
Education and poverty in rural China (2002, background): “Schultz (2000) and World Bank (2000) show that tuition subsidies increased enrollment in Mexico and other developing countries.”
PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico (2005, background): “Potential Impact of PROGRESA on the Adult Earnings of Children If current urban wages approximate what PROGRESA’s beneficiaries can expect to earn from their schooling in terms of future percentage increases in their wages, the internal rate of return, taking into account the costs of the grants, to”
Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social (2004, background): “comparison, double-difference estimates of changes in enrollment due to PROGRESA were under 5 percent for primary school students (largely because enrollment in primary school in Mexico was already high) and around 12 percentage points for Grades 68 (Schultz 2000).”