Interactive LISREL : user's guide

By Mathilda du Toit, S. D. Toit, Douglas M. Hawkins. 2001

392 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/779f34d2fe9f2ec7da5d5f7cafecd398fbbeaa3b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Perry
2. David H. Coursey
3. Jeffrey L. Brudney
4. Honggeng Zhou
5. Laura Littlepage
6. Gustaaf Mertens
7. Geert Crombez
8. C. Eccleston

Citations in the corpus

• The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS‐C): a preliminary validation (2003, methodology): “The factor structure of the PCS-C was investigated using the Interactive Lisrel (8.30) framework (Du Toit et al., 1999).”
• Psychometric Verification of Perry's Public Service Motivation Instrument (2008, methodology): “Instead, the expectation maximization algorithm was used, generating estimated values through a series of Markov chains around the covariance matrix of the entire set of indicators used in the analysis (for mathematical details, see Toit & Toit, 2001, pp. 387–388).”
• Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: the case of red wine (2004, unknown): “In all, 350 questionnaires were sent out.”
• Impact of Information Technology Integration and Lean/Just-In-Time Practices on Lead-Time Performance (2006, methodology): “We use weighted least-square method (Toit & Toit, 2001).”