Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities

By Luc Anselin, Attila V. Varga, Zoltan J. Acs. 2000

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76af263209eaefc968bac9aa05310f83fa376343

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case (2014, unknown): “In 2000, the authors extended their prior work to a sectorally disaggregated level (Anselin et al. 2000a).”
Penetrating the ``knowledge filter'' in regional economies (2005, background): “the knowledge was produced ( Anselin, et al. 1997, 2000 ).”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “Effects also varied across sectors; Anselin (2000) , for instance, found strong spillover impacts for electronics and instruments sectors.”
Spatial Spillovers and Innovation Activity in European Regions (2005, background): “important exceptions are the works by Anselin et al. (1997, 2000) focused in the US case, and”
Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria (2003, background): “In the existing literature, these e¤ects are typically ignored with a few exceptions such as Anselin et al. (1997, 2000) .”
Exploring the Knowledge Filter: How Entrepreneurship and University-Industry Relationships Drive Economic Growth ∗ (2006, background): “The argued explanation for the regional localization of knowledge is usually the tacit nature of knowledge, which is obtained via direct, interpersonal contacts (Anselin et al., 1997, 2000; Maskell and Malmberg, 1999; Hippel, 1987; Senker, 1995).”
Externalities, Economic Geography, And Spatial Econometrics: Conceptual And Modeling Developments (2003, background): “…interact to some extent, a feature that can be accommodated by a suitable hypothesis about the spatial extent of spillover as represented by the W matrix.2 It is the latter that gives an explicit spatial econometric orientation to the empirical analysis (see also Anselin, Varga, and Acs 2000).”
Spatial Spillovers and Regional Growth: A Cognitive Approach (2009, background): “See among others, Almeida and Kogut (1999), Maier and Sedlacek (2005), Coe and Helpman (1995), Acs et al. (1994), Anselin et al. (2000), Audretsch and Feldman (1996), Caniëls and Romijn (2005), Feldman and Audretsch (1999), Fischer (2006), Jaffe et al. (1993), Holod and Reed (2004), Jaffe (1989),…”
How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? (2010, background): “Another common assumption in the innovation literature is that services, particularly knowledge intensive business services (KIBS), may produce and diffuse knowledge that is crucial for innovation processes (Muller and Zenker 2001; Anselin, Varga, and Acs 2000).”