Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing
By P. Subramanian. 2006
600 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/767747f664fddf7f5ff795d84bf20c1773b54455
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Keith Rayner
- Miguel P. Eckstein
- Ralph R. Radach
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Antje Nuthmann
- Tim J. Smith
- Mary M. Hayhoe
- Dana H. Ballard
Citations in the corpus
- SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. (2005, methodology): “Furthermore, the SWIFT model is compatible with a general framework of the generation of saccades developed by Findlay and Walker (1999) and shares concepts with the dynamic field theory of movement preparation by Erlhagen and Schöner (2002).”
- How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm (2009, background): “However, the length of time the eyes remain in a given location (fixation duration) also varies considerably during scene viewing as a function of a variety of factors (Buswell, 1935; Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003; Henderson, 2003; Henderson & Hollingworth, 1998; Land & Hayhoe, 2001; Rayner, 1998).”
- Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. (2006, background): “Until now there has been little evidence in the literature that rapid eye movements are inXuenced by the semantic con - tent of a scene ( Findlay & Gilchrist , 2003 ; Henderson & Hol - lingworth , 1999 ) .”
- Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion (2011, background): “Perception of visual detail and encoding in memory only occurs for the information at the center of attention when the eyes stabilize on a point in space (fixations) [1–3].”
- ScanMatch: A novel method for comparing fixation sequences (2010, background): “The last 30 years has seen an explosion of interest in eye movements as both a topic of study and a research tool to probe perceptual, cognitive and neural processes (Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003; Rayner, 2009).”
- Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading (2006, background): “When a saccade is triggered, it will go to the target object that has emerged as a winner in the saliency competition (see Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003, for a recent discussion).”
- Neuronal Basis of Covert Spatial Attention in the Frontal Eye Field (2005, background): “, 1987), which postulates that saccade programming in the FEF and other oculomotor structures provides the basis for covert orienting (Findlay and Gilchrist, 2003; Moore et al., 2003; Moore and Fallah, 2004; Hamker, 2005).”
- Revisiting active perception (2016, background): “Those interested in a biological perspective on active perception should see Findlay and Gilchrist (2003) and Poletti and Rucci (2013).”
- AutoFocus: Efficient Multi-Scale Inference (2018, unknown): “Human vision is foveal and active [1, 20].”
- Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception (2009, background): “It seems clear that visuomotor control must make highly focused, task-specific use of metrically precise visual information (Ballard et al. 1997; Findlay & Gilchrist 2003).”
- Task and context determine where you look. (2016, background): “One of the essential properties of the human visual system is its active nature (Ballard, 1991; Ballard, Hayhoe, Pook, & Rao, 1997; Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003; O'Regan & Noë, 2001): Humans shift gaze between locations in the visual world on the order of three times per second, resulting in more than…”
- Mapping Visual Studies in Communication (2004, background): “The psychology of vision is a dynamic rather than a passive process—looking, not merely seeing—that goes through several steps: attending, orienting, reading, searching, and capturing scenes (Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003).”
- Visual search: a retrospective. (2011, background): “This is the starting point for this review article, which takes a different perspective than other thorough treatments of visual search (Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003; Nakayama & Martini, 2011; Verghese, 2001; Wolfe, 1998), in identifying the strategies and mechanisms that the brain utilizes to…”
- Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces (2008, background): “Tracking eye movements is an appropriate approach to address this issue, as sequences of eye fixations describe the way in which overt visual attention is directed and the intake of information is isolated [2].”
- The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search (2009, background): “Many of these studies deal with very low-level aspects of search and often focus on using the search task to uncover properties of the saccadic eye movement system (see Findlay & Gilchrist, 2003).”
- Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis. (2012, background): “Eye tracking systems, which sample gaze direction at rates between 60 and 2000 Hz, provide a continuous measure of attentional selection performed via eye movements (EMs; “overt attention”).”