Organizational Sponsorship and Founding Environments: A Contingency View on the Survival of Business-Incubated Firms, 1994–2007

By Alejandro S. Amezcua, Matthew G. Grimes, S. Bradley, Johan Wiklund. 2013

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76223c6954e94afae84003478f243ff5409c949c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem (2018, background): “, 2016), we note prior research on incubator intermediation has also been based on interactive, bridging processes (Amezcua et al., 2013; Etzkowitz, 2002).”
Developing and governing entrepreneurial ecosystems: the structure of entrepreneurial support programs in Edinburgh, Scotland (2016, methodology): “Rather, ESOs work within existing social frameworks and networks of existing firms, entrepreneur-led initiatives, and institutions to order to deliver services and resources to entrepreneurs (Amezcua et al., 2013).”
Planned Luck: How Incubators Can Facilitate Serendipity for Nascent Entrepreneurs Through Fostering Network Embeddedness (2020, methodology): “These networks supposedly help entrepreneurs overcome structural impediments and deficiencies, by developing social capital – the sum of the resources embedded within, and available through, the network (Amezcua et al., 2013; Eveleens et al., 2017; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998).”
Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda (2017, background): “As a result, the model of the university incubator for technology entrepreneurship (Amezcua et al., 2013; Gerlach & Brem, 2015) no longer fits with the characteristics of digital technology entrepreneurship.”
Social support timing and persistence in nascent entrepreneurship: exploring when instrumental and emotional support is most effective (2017, background): “Future research might also examine how the intentional facilitation of various support networks provided by incubators and accelerators (Amezcua et al. 2013), either through munificence or constraint, impact the speed and success of new venture formation.”
Policy for innovative entrepreneurship: Institutions, interventions, and societal challenges (2021, background): “While there is evidence of positive gains like the SBIR program in the US (Lerner, 2000), even these SBIR findings are mixed (Ko and McKelvie, 2018) with limited scholarly understanding of the behavioral effects of public sponsorship within the organization (Amezcua et al., 2013; Jourdan and Kivleni”