Welfare regimes and the experience of unemployment in Europe

By D. Gallie, Serge Paugam. 2000

569 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/760bef0febfc78c771992e3c354ec9def6a297f7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. C. Whelan
2. Richard Layte
3. B. Maître
4. Melike Wulfgramm
5. David J. Brady
6. Y. Kazepov
7. Jane Lewis
8. M. Powell

Citations in the corpus

• BEYOND ACTIVATION REFORMING EUROPEAN UNEMPLOYMENT PROTECTION SYSTEMS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LABOUR MARKETS (2006, background): “On such variables, three or four ideal-typical ‘models’ of unemployment protection can thus be identified in Europe (e.g., Esping-Andersen 1990; Gallie and Paugam 2000).”
• Welfare regime and social class variation in poverty and economic vulnerability in Europe: an analysis of EU-SILC (2009, background): “…and with a focus on social cohesion, involving social connectedness and communal identification (Friedkin, 2004), is that the evidence relating to the impact of factors such as unemployment and material deprivation on such outcomes is extremely modest (Gallie and Paugam, 2000; Whelan et al., 2002).”
• THE SUBSIDIARIZATION OF SOCIAL POLICIES: ACTORS, PROCESSES AND IMPACTS (2008, background): “(3) The Corporatist welfare system is characterized by social policies conceived in a meritocratic way: contributory schemes reproduce the socio-economic status that families achieve in the labour market through the position of the breadwinner (Gallie and Paugam 2000).”
• The Only Way is Up? Employment Protection and Job Mobility among Recent Entrants to European Labour Markets (2003, background): “Given that young people are among the most mobile groups in the labour market, some social scientists have pointed out that it is young peoples’ careers in particular that might be negatively affected by low opportunity levels in the labour market: with little opportunity of upward mobility, young p”
• Bridge or Trap? Temporary Workers’ Transitions to Unemployment and to the Standard Employment Contract (2008, unknown): “The assumptions being that a temporary job is better than no job; and that a transition to inactivity does not imply a similar level of ‘social disqualification’ as time spent in unemployment (i.e. Gallie and Paugam 2000).”
• Life satisfaction effects of unemployment in Europe: The moderating influence of labour market policy (2014, background): “Furthermore, strict eligibility rules and short benefit durations may translate into dependence on means-tested social assistance benefits or family transfers and an increased risk that unemployment be stigmatic (Gallie and Paugam, 2000: 4).”
• UNEMPLOYMENT, POVERTY AND SOCIAL ISOLATION: Is there a vicious circle of social exclusion? (2003, background): “Previous comparative research has shown that the unemployed have a particularly high vulnerability to poverty in almost all the European countries for which there is adequate evidence (Gallie and Paugam 2000).”
• The Welfare State and Relative Poverty in Rich Western Democracies, 1967-1997 (2005, background): “Unemployment is routinely identified as the most important poverty issue in Western Europe (Gallie and Paugam 2000; Hauser et al. 2000).”
• An Audit of the Welfare Modelling Business (2011, background): “Gough et al. (1997) and Gough (2001) have examined ‘social assistance regimes’, and Gallie and Paugam (2000) have examined active labour market policies.”
• Gender and welfare state change1 (2002, background): “Gallie and Paugam (2000) and Lodemel and Trickey (2000) both offer data for 1996 and 1999 respectively, but the gures for spending on active labour market programmes are very different.”