Primer on Risk Assessment and the Statistics Used to Evaluate Its Accuracy

By L. Helmus, K. Babchishin. 2017

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6c9835ce49f24b30cdb9463ddbb8932bbd7c243a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kristian Lum

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Suresh Venkatasubramanian
2. Kristian Lum
3. Angela Zhou
4. Sarah L. Desmarais
5. Silvia Chiappa
6. Luca Oneto

Citations in the corpus

• It's COMPASlicated: The Messy Relationship between RAI Datasets and Algorithmic Fairness Benchmarks (2021, background): “291 Psychologists are also informed by methodological primers [94, 95], which recommend statistical 292 tests to assess discrimination (i.”