Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance

2007

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75c73d227a8885c7884e3a183a71e9e816517d0a

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business (2008, background): “…insider control and blockholding owners may facilitate strategies based on investment in specific types of human assets because these owners may better protect the unique contributions (firm-specific skills, dedicated capital, etc.) that each type of actor must make (Gourevitch & Shinn, 2005).”
• From comparing capitalisms to the politics of institutional change (2008, background): “An important body of work in this vein is corporate governance studies which start by modeling patterns of firm-level coalitions among workers, managers, and owners (Aguilera and Jackson, 2003; Gourevitch and Shinn, 2005; Höpner, 2003).”
• A comparative political economy of diversified business groups, or how states organize big business (2009, background): “2 A number of recent works offer sophisticated political explanations for crossnational variation in corporate ownership (Roe, 2003; Gourevitch and Shinn, 2005; Högfeldt, 2004; La Porta et al., 2000), but they focus exclusively on the narrow issue of blockholding versus dispersed ownership, a…”
• The political economy of International Accounting Standards (2006, background): “Whereas accounting standards in the EU have previously been set at a national level by a combination of public and private actors, the process will”
• Institutions, Climate Change, and the Foundations of Long-Term Policymaking (2019, background): “…taxation (Steinmo, 1989), labor market regulation (Martin & Swank, 2012), vocational training (Thelen, 2004), liberalization (Thelen, 2014), industrial policy (Katzenstein, 1985), corporate governance (Culpepper, 2010; Gourevitch & Shinn, 2005), and varieties of capitalism (Hall & Soskice, 2001).”
• An Organizational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance: Costs, Contingencies, and Complementarities (2008, unknown): “Shares were given to employees in the wake of post-war efforts to ban ownership by zaibatsu families and lessen the concentration of economic power, but they quickly began to sell these shares and this led banks to intervene to stabilize the market (Jackson 2001; Gourevitch and Shinn 2005).”
• The Rule of Law and Economic Development (2008, background): “Among the candidates explored have been the power of financial incumbents (Rajan & Zingales 2004), partisanship (Roe 2003), and variations in the political alignments between labor and capital (Gourevitch & Shinn 2005; see Gourevitch 2003 for a review).”
• Open economy politics: A critical review (2009, background): “…Pinto and Pinto 2008), immigration (Leblang et al. 2007), foreign aid (Milner 2006), regulation (Mattli and Woods 2009; Richards 1999), corporate governance (Gourevitch and Shinn 2005), and global governance (Kahler 14 In this way, OEP is a subset of Liberalism, as described by Moravcsik (1997).”
• Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “Gourevitch (2003) and Gourevitch and Shinn (2005) have extended the political and coalitional approach even further.”