The hydraulic architecture of Pinaceae – a review

By J. Martínez‐Vilalta, Anna Sala, Josep Piñol. Plant Ecology, 2004

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7590bc9352755a313c8ef30ce7f1357502158f97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Is drought the main decline factor at the rear edge of Europe? The case of southern Iberian pine plantations (2012, background): “sylvestris in comparison to the other pine species (Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2004; Bréda et al., 2006).”
Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances (2013, background): “While the species is traditionally characterized as well adapted to drought conditions (Ellenberg, 1998), it is – among the Pinaceae – particularly vulnerable to xylem embolism under drought conditions (Cochard, 1992; Martínez-Vilalta et al., 2004).”
Phenotypic plasticity in mesic populations of Pinus pinaster improves resistance to xylem embolism (P50) under severe drought (2011, background): “However, these relationships change with the scale of study or genetic level (species/ populations/families; Martinez-Vilalta et al. 2004).”
Differential tree mortality in response to severe drought: evidence for long‐term vegetation shifts (2005, unknown): “This result is not surprising given that members of the family Pinaceae, and particularly trees in the genus Pinus , are more vulnerable to drought-induced mortality than other conifers ( Martinez-Vilalta et al . 2004 ).”
Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. (2006, background): “Low mid-day water potential in the dry season was similarly associated with higher wood density and slower conductivity sapwood across six tree species in Brazil [39] and 12 conifer species [55], but in these studies, leaf area per sapwood area was lower in the high-conductivity species.”
How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses (2013, background): “Typical of pine trees (Martinez-Vilalta et al. 2004), our trees behaved relatively isohydrically (Tardieu & Simonneau 1998), and declines in leaf water potentials and hydraulic conductivity occurred only just prior to mortality, weeks after permanent stomatal closure and zero transpiration rates…”
Selective drought-induced decline of pine species in southeastern Spain (2012, background): “Based on data of wood anatomy and hydraulic conductivity, P. sylvestris and P. nigra are regarded as more vulnerable to drought-induced xylem embolism than P. pinaster and P. halepensis (Oliveras et al. 2003; Martínez-Vilalta et al. 2004; Bréda et al. 2006).”
Cross‐species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and their implications for plant hydraulics (2006, background): “…(number of species) Linking leaf/stem deployment to WD and plant hydraulics Leaf and stem deployment can be linked with plant water use as follows (Martinez-Vilalta et al. 2004): LA Á g Á V ¼ Ks Á SAÁDC; ð1Þ where g is conductance of water vapour between leaves and air, V is vapour pressure…”
Radial growth responses to drought of Pinus sylvestris and Quercus pubescens in an inner-Alpine dry valley (2007, background): “The physiological activity of Pinus in July, however, is likely to induce drought stress, which is connected with an increased risk of cavitation, as Pinus trees were found to be more prone to drought induced xylem embolism than other conifers (Martinez-Vilalta & Pinol 2002; Martinez-Vilalta et al. ”