Cross‐species patterns in the coordination between leaf and stem traits, and their implications for plant hydraulics

By I. Wright, Daniel S. Falster, M. Pickup, M. Westoby. 2006

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/560dad3a851e3daf70b09cb4fdfd56fa350ec6cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. H. C. Cornelissen
2. Brian J. McGill
3. Brian J. Enquist
4. Rien Aerts
5. J. Messier
6. C. Violle
7. M. Lechowicz
8. G. T. Freschet

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. T. Freschet
2. C. Violle
3. J. H. C. Cornelissen
4. Brian J. Enquist
5. Rien Aerts
6. M. Lechowicz
7. Brian J. McGill
8. J. Messier

Citations in the corpus

• Interspecific integration of trait dimensions at local scales: the plant phenotype as an integrated network (2017, background): “Indeed, we find KBRANCH, a hydraulic trait, to be closely related to a number of resource acquisition-conservation traits (see also Wright et al. 2006).”
• Evidence of the ‘plant economics spectrum’ in a subarctic flora (2010, background): “At present, the relationship between root and shoot traits is still poorly understood and, for many traits, inconsistent (see Table 1 but also Wright et al. 2006).”