Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit and Probit Models

By R. Breen, Kristian Bernt Karlson, Anders Holm. 2013

762 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75598f33230910ba0222b63261874bc1fc12a8d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Giulia Assirelli
2. C. Barone
3. R. Breen
4. Kristian Bernt Karlson
5. Anders Holm
6. S. Sonnenschein
7. C. Galindo
8. Florencia Torche

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Barone
2. Giulia Assirelli
3. R. Breen
4. Kristian Bernt Karlson
5. Anders Holm
6. C. Galindo
7. S. Sonnenschein
8. Florencia Torche

In Statistics and Probability

1. R. Breen
2. Anders Holm
3. Kristian Bernt Karlson
4. Giulia Assirelli
5. C. Barone
6. Christina J. Cross

Citations in the corpus

• Gender segregation in higher education: an empirical test of seven explanations (2019, positive): “We first look at the corresponding parameters and at the variations of gender effects across models, then we use the KHB method for a formal decomposition exercise for categorical outcomes based on a mediation analysis (Breen et al. 2013).”
• A Note on a Reformulation of the KHB Method (2018, background): “Further explanation and proofs of this can be found in the study by Karlson, Holm, and Breen (2012) and Breen, Karlson, and Holm (2013).”