Jimmy Stewart Is Dead: Ending the World's Ongoing Financial Plague with Limited Purpose Banking

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward a Run-Free Financial System (2014, background): “3 My discussion has much in common with Kotlikoff (2010), Chalmley, Kotlikoff and Polemarchakis (2012), Admati and Hellwig (2012).”
Optimal Bank Capital (2013, unknown): “For example, mutual fund banking’ as advocated by Kotlikoff (2010) is equivalent to having banks be completely equity funded (operate with a 100% capital ratio); while a pure utility bank’ of the sort advocated by Kay (2009) can be seen as equivalent to a bank with a 100% liquidity ratio.”
Curbing the Credit Cycle (2015, unknown): “Others still have proposed a radical root-and-branch reform of the structure of banking (Kay (2009), Kotlikoff (2010)).”
A New Capital Regulation for Large Financial Institutions (2011, background): “2 For proposals to restrict bank size, see, for example, Fisher (2010); to restrict activities, see Kotlikoff (2010); for convertible bonds, see Squam Lake Report (2010);for living wills, see Goodhart and Schoenmaker (2010); for constraining executive compensations, see Bebchuck and Spamann (2009);…”
Energy, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: Five Propositions (2010, methodology): “The claimed advantages of a 100% reserve scheme include simplification of the financial system, reduction of government debt, elimination of the need for deposit insurance, greater control over the money supply and a reduced risk of bank runs and boom-bust cycles [110].”