Hippocampal‐neocortical interaction: A hierarchy of associativity

By P. Lavenex, D. Amaral. Hippocampus, 2000

874 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75335cdc245d2c480c8b4edf54fcde32690f4f2a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Pattern separation, completion, and categorisation in the hippocampus and neocortex. (2016, background): “These entorhinal cortex layer 5 neurons would then, by virtue of their backprojections (Lavenex & Amaral, 2000; Witter, Naber, et al., 2000) to the parts of cerebral cortex that originally provided the inputs to the hippocampus, terminate in the superficial layers (including layer 1) of those…”
A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory. (2006, background): “These entorhinal cortex layer 5 neurons would then, by virtue of their backprojections (Lavenex and Amaral, 2000; Witter et al., 2000a) to the parts of cerebral cortex that originally provided the inputs to the hippocampus, terminate in the superficial layers (including layer 1) of those neocortical”
The medial temporal lobe. (2004, background): “The anatomical studies described the boundaries and connectivity of these areas, initially in the monkey and subsequently in the rat (Burwell et al. 1995, Insausti et al. 1987, Lavenex & Amaral 2000, Suzuki & Amaral 1994).”
Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. (2004, background): “Indeed, available evidence from neuroanatomy ( Lavanex & Amaral, 2000 ), neurophysiology (Brown & Aggleton, 2001; Suzuki, 1999), neuroimaging (Davachi et al., 2003; Davachi & Wagner, 2002; Ranganath & D’Esposito, 2001), and neuropsychological (Aggleton & Brown, 1999; Eichenbaum & Cohen, 2001) studie”
A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease (2011, background): “1b ), which then re-connects — via the parahippocampal gyrus — with neocortical sites that provided the original hippocampal inpu”
Human memory formation is accompanied by rhinal–hippocampal coupling and decoupling (2001, background): “Anatomically, the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices provide most of the neocortical input to the entorhinal cortex, which in turn provides the predominant cortical input to the hippocampus via the perforant pat”
The hippocampal indexing theory and episodic memory: Updating the index (2007, background): “In association areas, where our knowledge is far more limited, they appear to be responding to complex objects, consistent with the idea that they are integrating input from many less complex columns ( Lavenex and Amaral, 2000 ).”
Off-line replay maintains declarative memories in a model of hippocampal-neocortical interactions (2004, background): “The two layers are connected in a reciprocal and hierarchical manne”
What can advertisers learn from neuroscience? (2007, background): “…long-term memory (Squire 1992), about the role of emotion in memory (LaBar & Cabeza 2006) and about how new memories are formed and later retrieved (Lavenex & Amaral 2000), little is known about how brand-related memories induced by advertising exposure are stored in the different memory systems.”