Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.
By Henry Wellman, D. Cross, Julanne Watson. 2001
4,063 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Peter Carruthers
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Rebecca Saxe
- Jorie Koster-Hale
- Noah D. Goodman
- Michael Tomasello
- Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
- Mark Schaller
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Peter Carruthers
- Tomer D. Ullman
- Michael Tomasello
- Noah D. Goodman
- Henry Wellman
- T. Ruffman
- Laura Schulz
In Social Psychology
- Michael Tomasello
- Ian A. Apperly
- Peter Carruthers
- V. Slaughter
- Henry Wellman
- Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
- Josh Tenenbaum
- Iroise Dumontheil
Citations in the corpus
- Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem (2013, positive): “These beliefs and desires can be used to predict aspects of a person’s actions, emotions, and other mental states, especially when the person’s beliefs and desires differ from those of the observer (Wellman et al., 2001; Wimmer and Perner, 1983).”
- “Do you know what I want?” Preschoolers’ talk about desires, thoughts and feelings in their conversations with sibs and friends (2007, methodology): “Although the meta-analysis conducted by Wellman and colleagues (Wellman et al., 2001) showed no clear performance contrast for experimental tasks tapping children’s awareness of own vs. others’ false-belief, it seems likely that attention to others’ inner states will have a particular importance in…”
- Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. (2011, background): “This latter finding extends to the five-step ToM scale a result that had been found previously for the FB task alone among English-speaking preschoolers in Western cultures such as Canada (see e.g., Jenkins & Astington, 1996), the United Kingdom (see e.g., Perner et al., 1994), and Australia (see e.”
- Being Left Out: Neurobiological Correlates of Social Rejection and their Developmental Trajectory (2011, neutral): “Zoals verwacht lieten de gedragsresultaten zien dat deze vaardigheden al voor de adolescentie aanwezig zijn (Grossman et al., 2008; Wellman et al., 2001).”
- Enhancing Empathy and Theory of Mind (2012, background): “While we know a great deal about the most basic forms of these abilities in preschoolers (eg, Eisenberg & Strayer, 1987 ; Wellman, Cross, & Watson, 2001 ), we know little about the later forms of these abilities and the experiences that may enhance these skills in late childhood and adolescence.”
- Mindful storytellers: Emerging pragmatics and theory of mind development (2013, background): “It has been shown that children perform similarly when ToM tasks are presented using real persons, videotaped persons, dolls, toys or story drawings (Wellman et al., 2001).”
- Young Bilingual Children's Heightened Sensitivity to Referential Cues (2011, background): “In addition, children whose parents more frequently use and explain mental-state terms in conversations with them develop an understanding of theory of mind at an earlier age (eg, Garner, Jones, Gaddy, & Rennie, 1997 ; Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002 ; Wellman, 1990 ; Wellman, Cross, & Watson, 200”
- HIGHER-ORDER THEORY OF MIND AND SOCIAL COMPETENCE IN SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN (2006, background): “The consensus of such studies is that, through a progression of stages starting at around 2 years, normallydeveloping children have acquired full competence on first-order ToM tasks by 5 years of age (WELLMAN et al., 2001).”
- Theories of Mind in Transition: A Microgenetic Study of the Development of False Belief Understanding (2006, result): “That fluctuations were especially prevalent during the lag before children’s mastery of the tasks provides evidence of a transitional period in children’s theory of mind development, akin to that implied by the earlier meta-analysis (Wellman et al., 2001).”
- The development of false-belief understanding in Japanese children: Delay and difference? (2006, methodology): “A recent comprehensive meta-analysis by Wellman, Cross, and Watson (2001) showed that false belief performance of children from different countries similarly increased from below- to above-chance during the preschool years.”