A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders.

By J. Lussier, S. Heil, Joan A. Mongeon, G. Badger, S. Higgins. Addiction, 2006

808 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Motivation and Autonomy in Counseling, Psychotherapy, and Behavior Change: A Look at Theory and Practice 1ψ7 (2011, background): “Those contingencies need to be appropriately applied to be effective; for instance, it is critical that the provided vouchers or monetary rewards are made contingent on, and directly available following, successful engagement in the requested activity (Higgins et al., 2000; Lussier et al., 2006).”
Cognitive-behavioral treatment with adult alcohol and illicit drug users: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (2009, background): “2000; Lussier et al., 2006; Prendergast et al., 2006), three studies on marital or family-based interventions (Edwards and Steinglass, 1995; Powers et al., 2008; Stanton and Shadish, 1997), and three on self-help approaches (Emrick et al., 1993; Kownacki and Shadish, 1999; Tonigan et al., 1996).”
Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. (2006, methodology): “A second, more recent meta-analysis [38] examined the most commonly used approach to CM, voucher-based reinforcement therapy.”
Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review (2015, neutral): “used in previously published meta-analyses (118,120).”