Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
By Marc D. Hauser. 2006
396 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/74709274dcb0e590ec5cffe3c7192f782fe8fcf3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Beate Sodian
- Markus Paulus
- Claudia Thoermer
- Sangeet S. Khemlani
- Maria Licata
- S. Kristen
- Philip N. Johnson-Laird
- A. Woodward
Citations in the corpus
- Moral Decision Making in Autonomous Systems: Enforcement, Moral Emotions, Dignity, Trust, and Deception (2012, background): “These emotions guide our intuitions in determining ethical judgments, although this is not universally agreed upon [Hauser 06].”
- Moral Disengagement in Processes of Organizational Corruption (2008, background): “This conceptualization makes sense given that most work on moral development argues that our ethical orientation to the world is socially learned rather than a genetic inheritance (Bandura, 1986; Kohlberg, 1984; though see Hauser, 2006 for a different view).”
- The psychology of moral reasoning (2008, background): “Instead, moral judgments trigger emotions, which are “downstream, pieces of psychology triggered by an unconscious moral judgment” (Hauser, p. 30–1; see also p. 156). In other words, emotions come after unconscious moral judgments. Mikhail (2007) defends the same view that a moral grammar yields rap”
- Social understanding and self-regulation predict pre-schoolers’ sharing with friends and disliked peers (2015, background): “Yet, on the other hand, it has been argued that all prosocial behaviours are subserved by the same psychological mechanisms (e.g., Hauser, 2006).”
- Unpacking Intuition: A Process and Outcome Framework (2011, background): “Thus, moral judgment is more a matter of “emotion and affective intuition than deliberate reasoning” (Greene & Haidt, 2002, p. 517) governed by a universally held sense of right and wrong (e.g., Rawlsian principles of justice, or of fairness) the processes underlying, which: (a) guide moral judgment”
- The evolved apprentice. How evolution made humans unique (2012, background): “Here, Sterelny introduces the parallel between moral and linguistic cognition recently proposed by Mark Hauser (2006).”