Indirect aggression in the media: A content analysis of British television programs

By Sarah M. Coyne, J. Archer. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/740ea022a9fba838319492277047f313e9ca1562

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Sarah M. Coyne
2. J. Archer
3. Ko Ling Chan
4. Murray A. Straus
5. Nicola Graham-Kevan
6. Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
7. D. Dutton
8. E. Stark

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. J. Archer
2. Sarah M. Coyne
3. Albert N. Katz
4. Andrea Bowes

In Social Psychology

1. Sarah M. Coyne
2. M. Eslea
3. J. Archer
4. Andrea Bowes
5. Albert N. Katz
6. C. Ferguson
7. Andrea Campbell
8. Brandon T. McDaniel

Citations in the corpus

• We're not friends anymore! unless... : The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression (2006, background): “…is often portrayed on television to be justified, rewarded, and by attractive characters, all characteristics that have been shown to increase the likelihood that viewers will behave aggressively after viewing aggression on television [e.g., Coyne and Archer, 2004; Donnerstein et al., 1994].”
• When Sarcasm Stings (2011, background): “Verbal aggression did not remain on this factor after sarcasm was included. actions (e.g., Coyne & Archer, 2004).”