When Sarcasm Stings

By Andrea Bowes, Albert N. Katz. 2011

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92b83c1466aa47ca56a87d34006db20e5ccd4bdd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. John D. Campbell
2. Francesca Gino
3. Albert N. Katz

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. John D. Campbell
2. Francesca Gino
3. Adam D. Galinsky
4. Li Huang
5. Albert N. Katz
6. Penny M. Pexman
7. J. Prooijen

In Language and Linguistics

1. John D. Campbell
2. Albert N. Katz

Citations in the corpus

• Are There Necessary Conditions for Inducing a Sense of Sarcastic Irony? (2012, background): “Finally, based on the argument in Bowes and Katz (2011) that sarcasm is a product of ongoing interactions, we looked at some temporal markers available in the LIWC ( past, present ).”
• The highest form of intelligence: Sarcasm increases creativity for both expressers and recipients (2015, background): “Because sarcasm is considered a form of humor especially by the expressers (e.g., Bowes & Katz, 2011), a procedure that manipulates sarcasm should also increase perceived humorousness, at least in the expressers.”