Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior

By Carlos Jensen, Colin M. Potts, Christian Jensen. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 2005

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/734040004ba9b7a95ee53e2f28282d105008acf9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Lorrie Faith Cranor
2. Heng Xu
3. H. Jeff Smith
4. Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch
5. Alessandro Acquisti
6. Tamara Dinev
7. Serge Egelman
8. Jin-Hee Cho

In Marketing

1. Spyros Kokolakis
2. Alessandro Acquisti
3. Lorrie Faith Cranor
4. Serge Egelman
5. Heng Xu
6. Janice Y. Tsai
7. Tamara Dinev
8. H. Jeff Smith

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Alessandro Acquisti
2. Spyros Kokolakis
3. Heng Xu
4. Lorrie Faith Cranor
5. Serge Egelman
6. Tamara Dinev
7. H. Jeff Smith
8. Janice Y. Tsai

Citations in the corpus

• The Effect of Online Privacy Information on Purchasing Behavior: An Experimental Study (2011, background): “As a result, people rarely read them (Privacy Leadership Initiative, 2001; Jensen et al., 2005; TRUSTe, 2006).”
• A Survey on Trust Modeling (2015, methodology): “Trust cues are measured based on the features of interface and structure design (to improve “the look and feel” of a CUI), content design (to preserve security and privacy), and social cue design (e.g., indicators of social presence such as photographs) [Jensen et al. 2005; Wang and Emurian 2005].”
• Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon (2017, background): “Several researchers have studied the privacy paradox under the perspective of psychological/cognitive biases and heuristics (Acquisti and Grossklags, 2003; 2005; 2007; Acquisti, 2004; Jensen et al., 2005; Cho et al., 2010; Wilson and Valacich, 2012; Brandimarte et al., 2013; Kehr et al., 2015; Kehr ”
• Disclosure: Psychology Changes Everything (2014, unknown): “6 For example, Jensen et al. (2005) find that fewer than 3% of consumers read the privacy disclosures that are so ubiquitous on websites and that 75% of consumers think that the existence of a privacy policy implies privacy protection (Turow et al. 2008), even though the actual thrust of such…”
• Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “Recent surveys, anecdotal evidence, and experiments have highlighted the privacy paradox: individuals state privacy concerns but behave in ways that seemingly contradict their statements (Acquisti 2004; Acquisti and Grossklags 2005a; Jensen et al. 2005; Norberg et al. 2007).”
• The biggest lie on the Internet: ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services (2018, background): “Furthermore, studies often rely heavily on self-report measures that can be problematic (see: Jensen, Potts, & Jensen, 2005).”