Environmental Attitudes as Predictors of Policy Support across Three Countries

By K. S. Rauwald, C. Moore. 2002

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/731b68480fe2fe5e35b61c9deaa36e12ef2774d7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Marketing

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Water demand management research: A psychological perspective (2010, methodology): “The scale measures beliefs about the limits of nature and resources, human impacts on the balance of nature, humans’ right to dominate over nature, and the potential for ecological catastrophe.TheNEPhasbeenusedtopredictbehaviorssuch as recycling [Johnson et al., 2004], support for environmental poli”
Understanding the Impact of Ecotourism Resort Experiences on Tourists’ Environmental Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions (2005, background): “…that has the greatest 552 Journal of Sustainable Tourism JOST 529 C:\edrive\jost\2005e\2005e\jost529.vp Wednesday, October 26, 2005 10:54:32 Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen predictive power (Cordano et al., 2003; Dunlap et al., 2000; Johnson et al., 2004; Rauwald & Moore, 2002).”
Environmental cognitions, land change, and social–ecological feedbacks: an overview (2013, background): “On the one hand, pro-environmental attitudes based on knowledge and abstract beliefs such as NEP and utilitarian attitudes toward nature are more associated with distant and indirect ecological behaviors such as policy support or donations to environmental organizations (Rauwald and Moore 2002).”
A Cross-Cultural Assessment of Three Theories of Pro-Environmental Behavior (2011, unknown): “…Camino, Biaggio, & Nordvik, 2007), U.S.-Japan-Mexico-Peru (Bechtel, Corral-Verdugo, Asai, & Riesle, 2006), Domincan Republic-Trinidad-United States (Rauwald & Moore, 2002), China and Japan (Branzei, Vertinsky, Takahashi, & Zhang, 2001), Costa Rica-Mexico-Venezuela-Brazil (Christen et al., 1998),…”
Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case (2009, background): “Some others (Bechtel et al., 2006; Rauwald and Moore, 2002; Leung and Rice, 2002) were also interested in cross-national or crosscultural comparisons.”
Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm (2007, background): “The second issue was the higher NEP scores shown in samples from Latin cultures than from U.S. samples (Bechtel et al., 1999; Corral-Verdugo & Armendariz, 2000; Rauwald & Moore, 2002; Schultz, Unipan, et al., 2000).”
Understanding Cultural Differences in the Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Business Students in the United States and Chile (2010, background): “We still know comparatively little about environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior in countries outside of the United States (Rauwald & Moore, 2002) and even less about the comparative views of business students.”
Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm in Systematic and E-mail Samples of College Students (2005, unknown): “Other researchers (e.g., Nooney, Woodrum, Hoban, & Clifford, 2003; Rauwald & Moore, 2002) have used a subset of the 12 items from the original scale along with other measures of behaviors and demographic variables.”
Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. (2014, background): “Rural Trinidadians also are more anthropocentric than their urban counterparts (Rauwald & Moore, 2002), and the same is true based on a large national sample in Canada (Huddart-Kennedy, Beckley, McFarlane, & Nadeau, 2009), although rural residents reported higher participation in recycling and…”
The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ (2004, background): “…social psychologists interested in environmental sustainability have applied knowledge from the research literatures on attitudes (Kellert, 1993; Rauwald & Moore, 2002), persuasion (Gonzales, Aronson, & Costanzo, 1988; Davis, 1995), commitment (Pallak, Cook, & Sullivan, 1980; Werner, Turner,…”