Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm
By A. Vikan, Cleonice Camino, A. Biaggio, H. Nordvik. 2007
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d87011b72cc46adb4af14d717a309560ad50fa0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- N. Erdoğan
- Jonathan W. Amburgey
- Dustin B. Thoman
- F. Hansstein
- Yi-Chun Tung
- Chih-Cheng Chen
- Johan Jansson
- Chien-Wen David Chen
In Marketing
- Jonathan W. Amburgey
- Dustin B. Thoman
- F. Hansstein
- Yi-Chun Tung
- Chih-Cheng Chen
- Johan Jansson
- Chien-Wen David Chen
- Fabián Echegaray
In Sociology and Political Science
- N. Erdoğan
- Johan Jansson
- Chien-Wen David Chen
- Jonathan W. Amburgey
- A. Nordlund
- Dustin B. Thoman
- K. Westin
- L. Steg
Citations in the corpus
- Examining drivers of sustainable consumption : the influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden (2017, background): “Many studies show positive correlations between personal norms and pro-environmental behavior in areas such as acceptability of energy policies (Steg et al., 2005), recycling (Thøgersen, 2003; Vining and Ebreo, 1992), and consumer purchase behaviors (Tanner and Kast, 2003; Thøgersen and Zhou, 2012).”
- Understanding Cultural Differences in the Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Comparative Analysis of Business Students in the United States and Chile (2010, background): “Whereas other researchers are starting to compare differences in environmental concern across cultures such as studies examining Brazil-Norway ( Vikan, Camino, Biaggio, & Nordvik, 2007 ); United States-Japan-Mexico-Peru ( Bechtel, Verdugo, Asai, & Riesle, 2006 ); Costa Rica-Mexico-Venezuela-Brazil (”
- Dimensionality of the New Ecological Paradigm (2012, methodology): “…calculate a Cronbach’s a (or a similar coefficient of reliability) as a measure of the construct (e.g., Cordano et al., 2003; Johnson et al., 2004; Vikan et al., 2007), and represents the most frequently employed method for scoring the scale.4 Model 2: Five uncorrelated factors structure.”
- Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm in Systematic and E-mail Samples of College Students (2005, background): “…study cannot provide clear evidence suggesting a general effect from an overall college program, research is currently underway on the influence of a specific environmental education module focused on increasing awareness of contemporary environmental issues in college students (Rideout, 2005).”
- Testing the new ecological paradigm scale: Turkish case (2009, methodology): “Some researchers (Nooney et al., 2003; Rideout et al., 2005; Bostrom et al., 2006) worked with a single selected population and tried to determine the character of general distribution and test the scale.”
- Exploring the Consumer Behavior of Intention to Purchase Green Products in Belt and Road Countries: An Empirical Analysis (2018, background): “Prior studies have indicated that social influences positively affect the intention to purchase green products [18,37,60].”
- Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil (2017, background): “On the other hand, it is a prevailing economic rationale, rather than environmental beliefs, which re-signifies solid waste for Brazilians as an opportunity (rather than burdensome, as it occurs in the UK for example), especially among so-called popular classes (Bekin et al., 2007).”