Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change?

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Correction Experiences on Social Media During COVID-19 (2021, unknown): “In general, susceptibility to correction depends on the politicization of an issue—more politicized issues are more difficult to correct (Bolsen & Druckman, 2018)—so we might expect different findings from a later data collection.”
Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate Change: The Role of Prior Views and Political Identification (2018, background): “…with other message variables (e.g. free market emphasis) had no effect on climate change beliefs (Dixon et al., 2017), and even backfired for American free market supporters (Cook & Lewandowsky, 2016) and Republicans with high knowledge in politics, science, and energy (Bolsen & Druckman, 2018).”
The Experience of Consensus: Video as an Effective Medium to Communicate Scientific Agreement on Climate Change (2019, background): “For example, although Bolsen and Druckman (2018) find support for the GBM among all partisan subgroups, they did note an exception for”