Too Much or Too Little Ambiguity: The Language of Total Quality Management

By M. Kelemen. 2000

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/726723332664e1bcf1a931ab473a13c46b6147a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Young-Han Chun
2. H. Rainey
3. Sungjoo Choi

Citations in the corpus

• Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies (2005, result): “This definition of organizational goal ambiguity (or clarity) is also consistent with some previous conceptions of the construct (DiMaggio 1987; Kelemen 2000; Locke et al. 1989).”
• Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge (2004, background): “empowerment and so on may take shifting, ambiguous meanings that allow actors to perform their jobs well enough without becoming too embroiled in sharing mental models at a more meaningful level (Keleman, 2000; Mezias and Starbuck, 2003; von Krogh and Roos, 1996).”