Monopsony in Motion: Imperfect Competition in Labor Markets
By Alan Manning. 2003
515 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72569e07e1241c939f1299b64d0d4d4b1a844819
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
Citations in the corpus
- The other margin: do minimum wages cause working hours adjustments for low-wage workers? (2007, unknown): “This ambiguity is deepened in a dynamic monopsony model, where the imposition of a minimum wage can raise total employment input for some firms (Dickens et al 1999; Manning 2003).”
- Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database* (2009, unknown): “In some circumstances this assumption is not appropriate, e.g., if there is widespread monopsony power within an industry (Manning, 2003) or an industry approximates a bilateral monopoly.”
- Firm Market Power and the Earnings Distribution (2015, unknown): “Burdett and Mortensen (1998), or alternatively Manning (2003), show that in this economy, as long as λ is positive and nite, there will be a nondegenerate distribution of wages even when all workers are equally productive.”
- Setting the Minimum Wage (2012, unknown): “Extensions to n-firms with some monopsony power do not alter significantly the results (Manning, 2003).”
- Job disamenities, job satisfaction, quit intentions, and actual separations: putting the pieces together (2007, unknown): “This may arise from labor market imperfections like imperfect information, collective bargaining (e.g. Daniel and Sofer 1998), and various frictions in labor markets (e.g. Manning 2003).”
- The Theoretical Foundation of Industrial Relations and its Implications for Labor Economics and Human Resource Management (2010, unknown): “…and have a modicum of market power, industrial relations also recognizes that wages and other terms and conditions of employment are likely to be set to serve the interests of employers, such as wages below the competitive level for infra-marginal workers (Manning 2003; Erickson and Mitchell 2007).”