A Two-Location Inventory Model with Transshipment and Local Decision Making

By Nils Rudi, Sandeep Kapur, David F. Pyke. Management Sciences, 2001

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Game Theory in Supply Chain Analysis (2004, methodology): “A contraction mapping argument in this form was used by van Mieghem (1999) and by Rudi et al. (2001).”
The multilocation transshipment problem (2006, background): “Other recent work on transshipments includes Archibald et al. (1997), Herer and Rashit (1999), Tagaras (1999), Rudi et al. (2001) and Dong and Rudi (2004).”
The Allocation of Inventory Risk in a Supply Chain: Push, Pull, and Advance - Purchase Discount Contracts (2004, background): “Inventory risk allocation among retailers is also studied in models with redistribution of inventory (e.g., Anupindi et al. 2001, Dong and Rudi 2001, Rudi et al. 2001 ).”
Inventory models with lateral transshipments: A review (2011, neutral): “In Rudi et al. (2001) transshipment prices are determined in advance by an accepted authority, for example by the manufacturer who would like to stimulate stock sharing and is also willing to invest in an information system to provide accurate stock level data.”
A General Framework for the Study of Decentralized Distribution Systems (2001, background): “While this paper was being written, we came across the work of Rudi et al. (1999) who discuss a duopoly model for inventory decisions with retailerdriven search and horizontal interaction.”