Capabilities, well‐being and human development: A survey

By Mozaffar Qizilbash. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

On formalizing fairness in prediction with machine learning (2017, background): “d in the foundations of human development paradigm by the United Nations[30, 31]. One of the major criticism of Equality of capability theory concerns the failure to identify of valuable capabilities [55]. Another criticism is that the informational requirement of this approach can be very high [1].”
Sen's Capability Approach to Welfare Economics (2004, background): “Sen’s capability approach has found wide resonance in a number of disciplines, including heterodox economics (Fukuda-Parr [23], Gasper [26], Robeyns, [54]), development economics (Alkire [1], Qizilbash [52]), development ethics (Crocker [20], Gasper [25]) and economic and political philosophy (Danie”
The Development of Capability Indicators (2009, background): “3 Empirical applications can be found in Schokkaert and van Ootegem (1990), Qizilbash (1996, 2004), Chiappero-Martinetti (2000), Layte et al. (2000), Laderchi (2001), Alkire (2002a, 2002b), Burchardt and Le Grand (2002), Burchardt and Zaidi (2003), Clark (2003), Kuklys (2005), and Anand et al.…”
Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach (2002, background): “…have reason to value, then we may wonder how Sen’s capability approach can offer a relevant framework for evaluating whether people have really been given the opportunities to exercise the capabilities they have reason to value (Desai, 1990; Qizilbash, 1996a,b; Sugden, 1993; Srinivisan, 1994).”
Measuring Non-Economic Well-Being Achievement (2005, background): “…components, domains or dimensions (Finnis, 1980; Nussbaum, 1988; Sen, 1990; UNDP, 1990–2004; Doyal and Gough, 1993; Galtung, 1994; Cummins, 1996; Qizilbash, 1996; Stewart, 1996; Narayan, 2000; Alkire, 2002, among many other studies).1 It is in particular thought to be a much richer or vital…”
Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare (2005, background): “For one thing, although it probably does make sense to add physical capabilities, the value of people’s 2 See also particularly Alkire (2002), Atkinson (1999), Gasper (1997), Qizilbash (1996) and Robeyns (2003).”
The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances (2005, background): “Some commentators have suggested that Sen pays insufficient attention to 'the means of freedom' (Qizilbash, 1996), while others have emphasised the links between human capital and human capability (Streeten, 1994; 2000; Haq, 1995; Sen, 1997; 1999; Bebbington, 1999).”
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, background): “…studies and development ethics that builds on the capability approach, see Alkire (2002); Clark (2002, 2005); Conradie (2013); Crocker (2008); Deneulin (2006a, 2006b, 2014); Drydyk (2011, 2013); Gasper (2004); Ibrahim (2011); Klasen (2000); Qizilbash (1996) and Qizilbash and Clark (2005).”