Youth Behavior, School Structure, and Student Risk of Victimization

By John D. Burrow, R. Apel. 2008

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71f9ff25989b2dd1c7bcba2b97abf6ddfb18982b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Validation of a brief measure of teachers’ perceptions of school climate: relations to student achievement and suspensions (2014, background): “…Apel 2008; Gottfredson et al. 2005; Soderstrom and Elrod 2006; Welsh 2000), bullying (Bandyopadhyay et al. 2009; Harel-Fisch et al. 2010; Nansel et al. 2001), student delinquency (Burrow and Apel 2008; Gottfredson et al. 2005) and the use of alcohol and other illegal substances (Brand et al. 2003).”
“Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”: Self-Control, Risky Lifestyles, and Repeat Victimization (2012, background): “…activity perspectives, behaviors that are ‘‘risky’’ (i.e., violent, criminal, or deviant) should increase the likelihood of victimization (Burrow and Apel 2008; Gover 2004; Mustaine and Tewksbury 1998; Sampson and Lauritsen 1990; Schreck et al. 2008; Smith and Ecob 2007; Taylor et al. 2008).”
Something Old, Something New: Revisiting Competing Hypotheses of the Victimization-Offending Relationship Among Adolescents (2011, background): “Indeed, previous studies typically report a positive effect of drug-use, fighting, weapon-carrying, and other criminal offense behavior on victimization (e.g., Burrow and Apel 2008; Campbell Augustine et al. 2002; Fisher et al. 1998; Jensen and Brownfield 1986; Lauritsen et al. 1992; Mustaine and ”
Preventing School Bullying: Should Schools Prioritize an Authoritative School Discipline Approach Over Security Measures? (2016, background): “Although prior studies have constructed and assessed variables that proxy these two preventative strategies (Burrow & Apel, 2008; Gregory et al., 2010; Wynne & Joo, 2011), the empirical evidence almost exclusively reveals the effect of one of the strategies in isolation.”
Correlates and Consequences of Peer Victimization: Gender Differences in Direct and Indirect Forms of Bullying (2010, methodology): “For example, Burrow and Apel (2008) found that youth attending more disordered schools—those with greater presence of factors such as gangs and hate-related graffiti and increased availability of drugs and guns—were at significantly greater risk of experiencing assault.”
Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: A General Strain Theory Perspective (2018, background): “…to examine the physical and psychological health of children and teenagers from a sociological standpoint (Bachman, Randolph, & Brown, 2011; Bloshnich & Bossarte, 2011; Burrow & Apel, 2008; Hutzell & Payne, 2012; Popp, 2012a, 2012b; Van Dorn, 2004; Watkins & Maume, 2011; Wei & Williams, 2004).”
The Effects of School Crime Prevention on Students’ Violent Victimization, Risk Perception, and Fear of Crime: A Multilevel Opportunity Perspective (2011, background): “…et al., 2009) and target suitability (Campbell Augustine et al., 2002; Wilcox et al., 2009) increase students’ risk of victimization, while guardianship reduces this risk (Anderman & Kimweli, 1997; Burrow & Apel, 2008; George & Thomas, 2000; Payne et al., 2003; Welsh, 2001; Wilcox et al., 2009).”