Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.

By D. Grimes, K. F. Schulz. The Lancet, 2005

817 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physiology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71b351b4bce98600708adcbd4ac78ffd4e5bf4f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. L. Du
2. Y. Niu
3. F. Sun
4. Chao Zhang
5. Sheng Li
6. Yonggang Zhang
7. J. Kwong
8. Xiantao Zeng

Citations in the corpus

• A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. (2006, background): “…test results are in patients with poor response than in those without poor response) and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR, the odds of positive test results in cases with poor response over the odds of positive test results in those without poor response) (Deeks, 2001; Grimes and Schulz, 2005).”
• The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015, background): “Those identifications are sometimes then offered a subsequent diagnostic test or procedure, or in some instances, a treatment or preventive medication (34, 35).”