A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome.
By Frank J. Broekmans, J. Kwee, D. Hendriks, B. Mol, C. Lambalk. Human Reproduction Update, 2006
1,247 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3c27c70d16b10b5c74bcf693d693f4a0496d67c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Reproductive Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. (2011, background): “To date, most clinical decisions on ovarian stimulation in IVF have been based on ovarian reserve tests which are good at predicting numbers of eggs retrieved but poor in terms of predicting live birth (Broekmans et al., 2006; Broer et al., 2009).”
- ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. (2011, methodology): “…inhibin B, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume, a number of dynamic tests and more recently anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) (Navot et al., 1987; Fanchin et al., 1994; Lass et al., 1997; Tomas et al., 1997; Hall et al., 1999; Bancsi et al., 2002; Broekmans et al., 2006, La Marca et al., 2010).”
- Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences. (2009, methodology): “Data were based on a meta-analysis (232) and recent updates (237, 238).”