Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science

By M. Wilson, J. Hoehn. 2006

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/717c74401aaa12b46e71f0020ad24a8d445166e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Kenter
2. Robert Costanza
3. I. Fazey
4. Michael Christie
5. Ida Kubiszewski
6. S. Gaines
7. T. Hyde
8. S. Lester

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. J. Kenter
2. Ida Kubiszewski
3. Robert Costanza
4. T. Hyde
5. Michael Christie
6. B. De Baets
7. G. Van Huylenbroeck
8. Kamran Zendehdel

Citations in the corpus

• Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA (2011, background): “The reliability of the benefit transfer estimates is solely dependent on both the applicability of the study sites and the quality of the original benefit estimation (Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
• An initial estimate of the value of ecosystem services in Bhutan (2013, background): “Benefit transfer is often used when resources and/or time is unavailable to do a more detailed, on-the-ground, data collection study (Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
• Science in support of ecosystem-based management for the US West Coast and beyond (2010, methodology): “However, this method is controversial (Wilson and Hoehn, 2006; Plummer, 2009).”
• Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services (2013, background): “We are also exploring how the outputs from ecosystem service flow models can inform improved approaches to spatially explicit valuation using a range of techniques, including but not limited to value transfer (Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
• METHODS, TRENDS AND CONTROVERSIES IN CONTEMPORARY BENEFIT TRANSFER (2009, unknown): “As a result, many of the advances of the literature are too costly (in terms of complexity or data needs) to implement in agency analyses (McComb et al., 2006; Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
• A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation (2013, background): “…however, include further discussion of primary valuation (various techniques for non-market valuation of ecosystem services) or secondary valuation (various types of benefit transfers), as these are described in detail elsewhere (Farber et al., 2006; Wilson and Hoehn, 2006; Bagstad et al., 2012).”
• Environmental decision making with conflicting social groups: A case study of the Lar rangeland in Iran (2010, background): “criteria at the same time (Azadi et al., 2007; Gregory and Wellman, 2001; Gregory et al., 2006; Ruto and Garrod, 2004; Trainor, 2006; Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”
• An evaluation of monetary and non-monetary techniques for assessing the importance of biodiversity and ecosystem services to people in countries with developing economies (2012, background): “Value transfer Value transfer Value transfer uses economic information captured at one place and time to make inferences about the economic value of environmental goods and services at another place and time (Wilson and Hoehn, 2006).”