Valuing ecosystem and economic services across land-use scenarios in the Prairie Pothole Region of the Dakotas, USA

By William Gascoigne, D. Hoag, L. Koontz, B. Tangen, T. Shaffer, R. Gleason. 2011

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making (2013, methodology): “In fact, many of the scientific papers reviewed for this article which propose frameworks, methods and models for mapping ecosystem services for decision support (e.g. Burkhard et al., 2012; Egoh et al., 2008; Feld et al., 2010; Gascoigne et al., 2011; Naidoo et al., 2008; Polasky et al., 2008; Raud”
A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services (2013, background): “Many studies of modelling and mapping erosion prevention exist, for example Gascoigne et al. (2011), Egoh et al. (2008), Conte et al. (2011), and Nelson et al. (2009).”
The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications (2017, methodology): “…policy of ‘no net loss’ implying no change in wetland area., For the GT scenario we assumed an aspirational wetland and coral reef restoration policy based on achieving wetland and coral reef areas similar to those in 2000 (Mitsch and Day, 2006; Gascoigne et al., 2011; Costanza et al., 2014).”