The Differential Relations of Parent and Peer Attachment to Adolescent Adjustment
By D. Laible, G. Carlo, M. Raffaelli. 2000
608 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/717c1904881bb5b8ecbced5595a2cf6031f03a46
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- J. Cassidy
- J. Stern
- D. Laible
- Jacquelyn T. Gross
- G. Carlo
- Stéphane Duchesne
In Demography
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- G. Carlo
- J. Cassidy
- J. Stern
- Fiorenzo Laghi
- D. Laible
- L. N. Osborne
In Social Psychology
- J. Cassidy
- J. Stern
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- D. Laible
- Jacquelyn T. Gross
- G. Carlo
- Fiorenzo Laghi
Citations in the corpus
- Attachment relationships and Internalizing and Externalizing problems among Italian adolescents (2012, background): “Some theorists (Laible et al., 2000) have argued for hierarchical organization inwhich the child's representation of themost salient attachment figure is the most influential and therefore the most predictive of developmental outcomes.”
- Empathy from infancy to adolescence: An attachment perspective on the development of individual differences (2017, result): “This pattern of results has been observed in older adolescents as well: Laible, Carlo, and Raffaelli (2000) reported that security on the IPPA was positively related to 16-year-olds’ empathy on the IRI, and both constructs were inversely related to aggression (Laible et al., 2000).”
- The Differential Relations of Maternal and Paternal Support and Control to Adolescent Social Competence, Self-Worth, and Sympathy (2004, methodology): “Following previous researchers (e.g., Carlo, Roesch, & Melby, 1998; Laible et al., 2000), the two scales were summed and averaged to form the sympathy scale (α = .72 in the present study).”
- Effects of Attachment on Early and Later Development (2007, background): “In adolescent years, the individual begins to transfer the attachment behaviour learned in childhood to social situations and peer groups (Laible et al., 2000).”
- An Exploratory Study of Youth Mentoring in an Urban Context: Adolescents' Perceptions of Relationship Styles (2004, background): “as this support decreases, self-reported general psychological well-being also decreases (Ben-Zur, 2003; Helsen et al., 2000; Laible et al., 2000).”
- College Students’ Adjustment: The Role of Parent–College Student Expectation Discrepancies and Communication Reciprocity (2008, background): “These variables, in turn, may serve as predictors of lower negative affect ( Laible et al. 2000 ) and better adjustment to college.”
- Stability and Changes in Problem Behavior During Adolescence: Latent Growth Analysis (2004, background): “However, research also shows that close relationships with peers promote healthy adjustment, increase self-perceived competence and self-worth and decrease risk of problem behavior (Armsden and Greenberg, 1987; Laible et al., 2000 ).”
- Empathy as a mediator of the relations between parent and peer attachment and prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors in Mexican American college students (2012, background): “That is, by late adolescence/young adulthood, one might expect weaker direct relations between parent attachment and behavioral outcomes as peers become increasingly important socialization agents (e.g., Laible et al., 2000).”
- Attachment Representations and Time Perspective in Adolescence (2009, methodology): “According to Laible et al. (2004) it is not clear, however, how both peer and parent attachment relationships become integrated into an adolescent’s internal working model of the self, especially when experiences with parents and peers are highly divergent.”