ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial.

By Michael Falkenstein, J. Hoormann, Stefan Christ, J. Hohnsbein. Biological Psychology, 2000

1,493 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/714ed82f4f3d38677f823cafb1f037b10d32cc3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

A Cognitive Control Perspective of Self-Control Strength and Its Depletion (2010, background): “for conflict or error ( Falkenstein et al., 2000 ).”
On the ERN and the significance of errors. (2005, neutral): “…it is thought to reflect the activity of a generic response monitoring system (Bernstein, Scheffers, & Coles, 1995; Dehaene, Posner, & Tucker, 1994; Falkenstein et al., 1991, 2000; Holroyd, Dien, &Coles, 1998; Luu, Flaisch, & Tucker, 2000; Miltner, Braun, & Coles, 1997; Van ’t Ent & Apkarian,…”
The Efficacy of Psychophysiological Measures for Implementing Adaptive Technology (2001, background): “High time pressure, however, has been demonstrated to reduce the amplitude of the ERN component (Falkenstein et al., 2000).”
Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. (2001, background): “…include experimental settings in which participants have to respond under time pressure ~Falkenstein, Hohnsbein, Hoormann, & Blanke, 1990; see also Falkenstein et al., 2000!, have been deprived of sleep ~Scheffers, Humphrey, Stanny, Kramer, & Coles, 1999!, or are presented with degraded stimuli…”
Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. (2007, neutral): “The no-go P300 has been linked to response inhibition mechanisms, although this hypothesis is debated (Azizian et al., 2006; Eimer, 1993; Falkenstein et al., 2000; Salisbury et al., 2004).”
Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs (2001, background): “Cumulating evidence over the past 10 years suggests that the ERN is a correlate of error processing which is elicited when a comparison between representations of the appropriate (correct, intended) and the actual response yields a mismatch (e.g., Coles et al., 2000; Falkenstein et al., 2000; Gehrin”
Event-Related Potentials as Indices of Time Processing: A Review (2004, background): “, 2000), whereas correct responses evoke an even smaller negative wave (Falkenstein et al., 2000; Luu et al., 2000; Vidal et al., 2000).”
Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data (2007, methodology): “Second, the ERN has been observed to have an increasing amplitude the more participants emphasize accuracy over speed in their performance (Falkenstein et al., 2000; Gehring et al., 1993).”
The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (2002, background): “Although, often, the ERN is considered to reflect the detection of overt errors based on a comparator process (Falkenstein et al., 2000; Gehring et al., 1993), we have argued that the ERN reflects the detection of conflict rather than of overt errors (Carter et al., 1998).”
Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency (2003, methodology): “The ERN is a negative component, similar in morphology to the N2, which is elicited following errors in speeded response time (RT) tasks (for a review, see Falkenstein, Hoormann, Christ, & Hohnsbein, 2000 ).”
Emotion and motivation: the role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. (2002, background): “This potential was named the error-related negativity (ERN) (for reviews, see Brown, 1999; Falkenstein et al., 2000; Scheffers & Coles, 2000).”
Evidence for an Integrative Role of P3b in Linking Reaction to Perception (2005, background): “In this way, for example the Pe following an error, which has been conceived as the P3 evoked by the error (Falkenstein et al., 2000) might reflect the monitoring of the immediate consequences to be drawn from the error depending on instructions (e.”