Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task.

By Sander Nieuwenhuis, K. R. Ridderinkhof, J. Blom, Guido P. H. Band, A. Kok. Psychophysiology, 2001

1,227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7256a12360011bf6a1d53a07a570723817315ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Error-Related EEG Potentials Generated During Simulated Brain–Computer Interaction (2008, background): “It has been proposed that the positive peak generated in a reaction task was associated with conscious error recognition [ 14 ].”
Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs (2001, background): “A recent paper suggests that the Pe may be associated with conscious error recognition and/or task set adjustments after errors (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001).”
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition (2006, background): “The ERN, which occurs within milliseconds of a response, reflects an early, pre-conscious stage of conflict monitoring that is associated with dorsal regions of the ACC, whereas the error-positivity (P e ), which occurs ∼200 ms post response, is associated with the awareness of error commission and ”
Error-related anterior cingulate cortex activity and the prediction of conscious error awareness (2012, background): “Autonomic arousal and PES have been shown to be reduced or absent following unaware errors (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001; Endrass et al., 2007; O’Connell et al., 2009).”
On the ERN and the significance of errors. (2005, neutral): “…may reflect variation in the error positivity (Pe), a centroparietally maximal event-related brain potential that follows the ERN and has been related to processes that follow error detection, such as error awareness or error salience (cf. Falkenstein et al., 2000; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001).”
Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. (2011, background): “Perhaps the clearest evidence for a two-stage process in action awareness comes from studies of error awareness (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001).”
Brain Dynamics Underlying the Nonlinear Threshold for Access to Consciousness (2007, background): “], anterior negativity evoked by undetected errors [”
Prefrontal contributions to metacognition in perceptual decision-making (2012, background): “However, these assessments vary in their accuracy, such that errors can be committed in the absence of awareness (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2001) and external manipulations of choice sometimes go unnoticed (Johansson et al., 2005; Logan and Crump, 2010).”
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition (2014, background): “When the agent is very confident about the state of the world then the value of information is low [133, 134].”