Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs
By Markus Ullsperger, D. von Cramon. NeuroImage, 2001
685 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51ec7ed5bcd2c636bb4e0a41d868c6e8bb49c9b8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Matthew Botvinick
- J. Cohen
- Cameron S. Carter
- Markus Ullsperger
- Tobias Egner
- Hugo D. Critchley
- R. Hester
- Michael J Frank
Citations in the corpus
- Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, neutral): “A closer look into our flanker studies reveals that in one study, a speeded flanker task was used that produced nearly chance accuracy on incongruent trials (Ullsperger & von Cramon, 2001).”
- Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response (2005, background): “Notably, this did not include the pre-SMA activity attributable to correct conflict processing.”
- Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas (2008, background): “, but many such activations actually involve the pre-SM”
- The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task (2005, background): “…et al., 2003; Hazeltine et al., 2003; Kerns et al., 2004; Leung et al., 2000; MacDonald et al., 2000; Milham et al., 2001, 2003; Pardo et al., 1990; Ullsperger and von Cramon, 2001; vanVeen et al., 2001), and the DLPFC's purported role in the implementation of cognitive control (Durston et al.,…”
- Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots (2004, methodology): “The choice reaction time (RT) tasks introduced by Stroop (1935) , Simon (1990), and Eriksen (Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974) are prototypical representatives of experimental paradigms that induce conflicting responses.”
- Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks (2008, background): “Performing correctly on trials involving high response conflict is cognitively demanding and engages a broad task-related network of brain regions, in particular the pMFC and lateral frontal, premotor, and anterior insular cortices and the intraparietal sulcus (12, 33, 34).”
- Neural mechanisms involved in error processing: A comparison of errors made with and without awareness (2005, background): “This dorsal ACC/pre-SMA region was of interest due to the previous studies that have identified its activity during error processing (Garavan et al., 2003; Ridderinkhof et al., 2004; Ullsperger and von Cramon, 2001).”
- A midline dissociation between error-processing and response-conflict monitoring (2003, background): “The pre-SMA, on the other hand, would appear a likely candidate for monitoring response conflict given its role in motor planning ( Tanji, 1994; Picard and Strick, 1996).”
- Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex. (2004, background): “Human ACC activation increases when errors are made in many situations including go/no-go [34,35], flanker [ 30 ], oddball target detection [34], and motion prediction [36] tasks.”
- Violation of Expectation: Neural Correlates Reflect Bases of Prediction (2008, neutral): “Additional strong foci of activations included the right frontal opercular cortex, the pre-SMA, and bilateral para-median and lateral portions of the posterior cerebellum (Figure 2A, Figure 3A).”