Separate Worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization

By M. Storper. 2018

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c1acf3f1e7cc99f272702b17c184a74f84b2ecb4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. D. de Vries
2. M. Timmer
3. Huiwen Gong
4. S. Miroudot
5. R. Hassink
6. Henry S. C. Yeung
7. B. Los
8. G. Macleod

In Political Science and International Relations

1. G. D. de Vries
2. Huiwen Gong
3. M. Timmer
4. R. Hassink
5. Henry S. C. Yeung
6. S. Miroudot
7. Michaela Trippl
8. Ron A. Boschma

Citations in the corpus

• Regional worlds: from related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks (2020, background): “Intense interregional competition has also driven major technological innovation and employment shifts within and between regional economies in North America and Western Europe (Storper, 2018).”
• Functional specialisation in trade (2018, background): “More generally, we fully agree with Storper (2018) that the use of a broader structural and developmental macro framework in combination with microeconomic analysis will help in better understanding the current regional economic divergence around the world.”
• Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: towards a theoretical framework (2018, background): “Such a framework could also contribute to policies aiming at alternative goals such as de-growth, social innovation, sustainability, inclusive and cohesive growth, and social equality (e.g., Faller, 2016; Hansen & Coenen, 2015; Krueger, Schulz, & Gibbs, 2017; Phelps, Atienza, & Arias, 2018; Storper,”