Regularized Generalized Canonical Correlation Analysis
By Arthur Tenenhaus, Michel Tenenhaus. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011
379 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Food Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70b0790e1b9f253159486d1bf149bfeed2bb5a9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Joseph F. Hair
- Jörg Henseler
- Siegfried P. Gudergan
- G. Tomas M. Hult
- Detmar W. Straub Jr.
- Edward E. Rigdon
In Food Science
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Joseph F. Hair
- Jörg Henseler
- Siegfried P. Gudergan
- Pauline Ash Ray
- Geoffrey S. Hubona
- Kai Oliver Thiele
Citations in the corpus
- Non-Metric Partial Least Squares (2012, methodology): “Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus [31] also demonstrated that new Mode A PLS-PM, when centroid or factorial schemes are used, monotonically converges, for each Table 1 Iterative steps of the NIPALS algorithm, PLS-R algorithm (first component) and PLS-PM algorithm with new Mode A option.”
- Harnessing the complexity of metabolomic data with chemometrics (2014, methodology): “sion and its extensions [42,47], PLS path modelling [48], generalised canonical analysis [49] and multiblock redundancy”
- Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS (2014, background): “Indeed, there has been substantial further development of PLS—including by Dijkstra himself 1 — and there is a large body of literature on PLS published in other methods and statistics journals than the ones considered by R&E, including Psychometrika (A. Tenenhaus & Tenenhaus, 2011; Dijkstra & Scher”
- On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations (2017, methodology): “Researchers who intend to estimate a factor model should use CB-SEM, while researchers intending to estimate a model of composites should use a composite-based method like PLS-SEM, GSCA, or another in that class (e.g., Dijkstra & Henseler, 2011; Tenenhaus & Tenenhaus, 2011).”
- DIABLO: an integrative approach for identifying key molecular drivers from multi-omics assays (2019, methodology): “…Explained (JIVE) (Lock et al. , 2013), sparse MultiBlock Partial Least Squares (Li et al. , 2012), regularized and sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011; Tenenhaus et al. , 2014) and Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA) (Argelaguet et al. , 2018).”
- Quadratic Shrinkage for Large Covariance Matrices (2020, background): “, 2009), psychology (Markon, 2010), political science (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011), analytical chemistry (Guo et al.”
- Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines (2016, methodology): “…1 by alternative indicator weight generators, such as principal component analysis (Tenenhaus, 2008), generalized structured component analysis (Hwang and Takane, 2004; Henseler, 2012), regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011), or even plain sum scores.”
- Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling (2013, methodology): “A small modification of the PLS algorithm is needed to actually maximize a covariance criterion, but simulations show that both approaches are in very close correspondence (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011).”
- A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling (2015, methodology): “Variance-based SEM methods—such as partial least squares path modeling (PLS; Lohmöller 1989; Wold 1982), generalized structured component analysis (GSCA; Henseler 2012; Hwang and Takane 2004), regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011), and best fitting pro”
- Learning Relationships between Text, Audio, and Video via Deep Canonical Correlation for Multimodal Language Analysis (2019, background): “• GCCA: Generalized CCA (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011) learns a common subspace across multiple views.”
- Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods (2017, methodology): “Future research should also include a broader set of composite-based SEM methods such as regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011), best fitting proper indices (Dijkstra and Henseler 2011), and the extended PLS algorithm, which Lohmöller (1989)…”
- Linking Image and Text with 2-Way Nets (2016, methodology): “The algorithm has been generalized in many ways: regularization was added [29], kernels were introduced [2, 30, 4], versions for more than two sources were developed [41] etc.”
- Bridging Design and Behavioral Research With Variance-Based Structural Equation Modeling (2017, methodology): “…generalized structured component analysis (Hwang and Takane 2004), traditional partial least squares (PLS) path modeling (Lohm€oller 1989), consistent PLS path modeling (Dijkstra and Henseler 2015a, 2015b), and regularized generalized canonical correlation analysis (Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus 2011).”
- On the Emancipation of PLS-SEM: A Commentary on Rigdon (2012) (2014, background): “Whereas in CB-SEM, fit refers to the distance between an observed covariance matrix and an implied covariance matrix, in PLS-SEM fit relates to the degree towhich a correlation or covariancebased criterion is being maximized (Hanafi, 2007; Tenenhaus and Tenenhaus, 2011).”