Technology, innovation capacity, and the export attitude of small manufacturing firms: a logit/tobit model
By Guido Nassimbeni. 2001
279 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/70ab47ca7812db6cad43308b47b18c28782a5415
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Joaquín Alegre
- Antonella Zucchella
- T. Buck
- A. Majocchi
- N. Zahoor
- Ellen Haustein
- D. Obodoechi
- Maria Giuffrida
In Strategy and Management
- Alfredo D'Angelo
- Joaquín Alegre
- T. Buck
- Antonella Zucchella
- A. Majocchi
- Anabel Fernández-Mesa
- Jiancheng Guan
- Ellen Haustein
Citations in the corpus
- Management control systems in innovation companies: a literature based framework (2014, methodology): “The original measure of Nassimbeni (2001) identifies the following components of innovation capability: ability to generate product and process innovations, amount of investment in innovation, inter-organisational relationships.13 In order to develop innovation capability, enterprises need to…”
- Performance, Internationalization, and Firm-specific Advantages of SMEs in a Newly-Industrialized Economy (2006, background): “For example, Nassimbeni (2001) examined the effect of innovation activities on the export performance of very small companies (average 17 employees) in Italy and came to a similar conclusion.”
- Innovation capabilities and performance: are they truly linked in SMEs? (2019, background): “As a result, it is possible to state that products innovation is a dimension or innovation capability of enterprises that usually has positive and significant effects at the level of business performance in enterprises, especially SMEs (Nassimbeni, 2001; Tomlinson, 2010; JiménezJiménez & Sanz-Valle,”
- Analysing the link between export intensity, innovation and firm size in a science-based industry (2007, background): “The technology profile is a structural factor that would affect positively export performance in the case of science-based firms (Nassimbeni, 2001; Piercy, Kaleke, & Katsikeas, 1998; Yli-Renko, Autio, & Tontti, 2002).”
- Collaboration and Internationalization of SMEs: Insights and Recommendations from a Systematic Review (2020, background): “For instance, research shows that engagement in networks develops the ability to absorb and exploit external knowledge residing with partners (Ferreras-Méndez et al. 2019; Tolstoy and Agndal 2010), which, in turn, enhances SMEs’ innovation capacity (Nassimbeni 2001; Stoian et al. 2017).”
- Innovative capability and export performance of Chinese firms (2003, background): “Although former empirical researches on the determinants of export performance are numerous and cover a wide spectrum of problems, the technological and the innovation-related issues have received much less attention than factors such as the firm’s demographic or management characteristics (Nassimbe”
- Resources and digital export: An RBV perspective on the role of digital technologies and capabilities in cross-border e-commerce (2021, background): “…and integration of the value chain is more effective thanks to blockchain and internet of things, while additive manufacturing allows to reach higher productivity, thus leading to better performances and higher international competitiveness (Nassimbeni, 2001; Van Beveren and Vandenbussche, 2010).”
- Exporting and innovation performance: Analysis of the annual Small Business Survey in the UK (2011, background): “However, in the context of smaller firms, export performance is generally examined in terms of a firm’s demographics and management characteristics rather than innovative effort (Nassimbeni, 2001).”
- Effects of innovation strategies on export performance: New empirical evidence from developing market firms (2020, background): “…the prior studies conducted in developed economies show that product innovation has a stronger impact on export performance than process innovation (Nassimbeni, 2001), whereas others, though few, show that process innovation has more impact in determining export performance (López Rodríguez and…”
- Geographical pathways for SME internationalization: insights from an Italian sample (2013, methodology): “Empirical evidence supports the idea that innovation is an important source of competitive advantage in international markets and a significant determinant of export success (Basile, 2001; D’Angelo, 2012; Golovko and Valentini, 2011; Rodriguez and Rodriguez, 2005; Nassimbeni, 2001; Roper and Love, 2”