Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance
By Patrick M. Kreiser, Louis D. Marino, D. Kuratko, K. Weaver. 2013
430 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7029a4d3f44d041bafa8fecfaadca8f4c64f1e4c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Johan Wiklund
- Holger Patzelt
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Stephanie A. Fernhaber
- F. W. Agbola
- V. B. Nakku
- Morgan P. Miles
- V. Maksimov
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Holger Patzelt
- Johan Wiklund
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Stephanie A. Fernhaber
- Isabella Hatak
- Roy Thurik
- Jafar Rezaei
- Roland J. Ortt
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Holger Patzelt
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Johan Wiklund
- Isabella Hatak
- Roy Thurik
- Stephanie A. Fernhaber
- F. W. Agbola
- Rafał Kusa
Citations in the corpus
- An Analysis of the Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions among Students: A Romanian Case Study (2016, background): “The characteristic that sets out a clear difference between an entrepreneur and an employee is the ability to take risks [45–47].”
- Entrepreneurial Orientation and International Scope: The Differential Roles of Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-Taking (2014, background): “For example, innovativeness involves upfront investments (Kreiser et al., 2013), proactiveness entails high search, learning, and retaliation costs (Bell, 1995), and risk-taking requires greater slack for potential losses (Shrader et al., 2000).”
- Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: The role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception (2021, background): “Their impact on performance can be affected by other factors; for example, individualism (Kreiser et al., 2013).”
- The interrelationship between SME government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy perspective (2020, result): “These results are consistent with earlier research that suggests that the potential benefits of each EO dimension on firm performance may depend on contextual factors (Anderson, Kreiser, Kuratko, Hornsby, & Eshima, 2015; Kreiser et al., 2013; Wales et al., 2013).”
- Mental disorders in the entrepreneurship context : When Being Different Can Be an Advantage (2018, background): “, 2018)—may conflict with financial stability and may be detrimental to financial firm performance (Kreiser et al., 2013).”
- The role of affect in entrepreneurial orientation (2018, background): “As mentioned by Kreiser et al. (2013), the different dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation can have different effects on entrepreneurial success.”
- Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the mediating role of functional performances (2018, background): “However, it has been shown that the three dimensions of EO (innovativeness, risk-taking and proactiveness) have independent variances, which is why, in some empirical studies, they are considered separately (Kreiser et al., 2013; Dai et al., 2014).”