Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation

By Yuko Heath, R. Gifford. 2002

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ffc47eadc768e3298e355d8dd731c34c5502605

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. L. Steg
2. C. Vlek
3. Dorian Litvine
4. Rolf Wüstenhagen
5. W. Abrahamse
6. R. Gifford
7. Emine Sarigollu
8. Myriam Ertz

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. L. Steg
2. W. Abrahamse
3. C. Vlek
4. R. Gifford
5. Emine Sarigollu
6. Myriam Ertz
7. F. Karakas
8. Rolf Wüstenhagen

In Transportation

1. L. Steg
2. I. Ajzen
3. W. Abrahamse
4. C. Vlek
5. S. Russell
6. Zhaohua Wang
7. Cheryl A. Robinson
8. C. Young

Citations in the corpus

• How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? (2009, background): “However, Heath and Gifford (2002) did not find personal norms, awareness of consequences or ascription of responsibility to explain variance in addition to the TPB variables.”
• Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors (2016, background): “Heath and Gifford (2002) Field experiment Intention, perceived behavioral control, social norms, moral norms, environmental concerns and values, availability of a universal bus pass Use of public transportation Theory of Planned Behavior Bus ridership significantly increased after the introduction…”
• Bringing habits and emotions into food waste behaviour (2017, methodology): “…used the TPB as the theoretical underpinnings of their research and it has been successfully used to predict household behaviours including water conservation (Fielding et al., 2012; Russell and Fielding, 2010), public transportation (Heath and Gifford, 2002), and recycling (Tonglet et al., 2004).”
• Helping "light green" consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market (2011, methodology): “…previous research: - personal norms refer to feelings of moral obligation to act proenvironmentally (Ek and Söderholm, 2008; Harland et al., 1999; Heath and Gifford, 2002; Kaiser et al., 1999; Kotchen and Moore, 2007; Parker et al., 1995; Steg et al., in press), - perceived self-efficacy (PSE)…”
• Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions (2015, background): “It was also integrated in studies interested in understanding environmental behaviors (e.g., Heath & Gifford, 2002; Nigbur, Lyons, & Uzzell, 2010; Onwezen, Bartels, & Antonides, 2014).”
• Determinants and policy implications for household electricity-saving behaviour: Evidence from Beijing, China (2011, background): “The use of energy-saving light bulbs (Meijnders et al., 2001), the use of unbleached paper (Harland and Staats, 1999), car use (Bamberg and Schmidt, 2003), and bus use for commuting (Heath and Gifford, 2002) seem to be effectively explained by variables from TPB.”
• Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda (2009, background): “Various scholars have integrated concepts and variables from different theoretical frameworks, showing that behaviour results from multiple motivations (e.g., Guagnano et al., 1995; Harland et al., 1999; Heath & Gifford, 2002; Stern et al., 1993, 1995).”
• Shedding light on the psychological and behavioral determinants of travel mode choice: A meta-analysis (2017, unknown): “…habits (Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003; Donald et al., 2014; Verplanken, Aarts, van Knippenberg, & Moonen, 1998), role beliefs (Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003), personal norms (Manstead & Parker, 1995; Parker, Manstead, & Stradling, 1995) and descriptive norms (Donald et al., 2014; Heath & Gifford, 2002).”
• Key Factors for Successful Leisure and Tourism Public Transport Provision (2007, background): “A more relevant approach to determining the use of public transport in leisure time can be identiWed from a number of interesting qualitative research activities, concerning diVerent mobility patterns (see for example Gärling et al., 1998; Hunecke et al., 2001; Heath and GiVord, 2002; Freitag and Ka”