Ethical Perspectives on Qualitative Research in Applied Psychology.

By Beth E. Haverkamp. 2005

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fa06ba99d89516c416a1eaca28564e10c83a2d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Ponterotto
2. I. Grieger
3. Susan L. Morrow
4. H. Levitt
5. Sue L. Motulsky
6. Fredrick J. Wertz
7. Jenny Bimrose
8. D. Polkinghorne

In Social Psychology

1. J. Ponterotto
2. I. Grieger
3. H. Levitt
4. Susan L. Morrow
5. Fredrick J. Wertz
6. Sue L. Motulsky
7. A. Clarke
8. Jenny Bimrose

In Sociology and Political Science

1. I. Grieger
2. Jenny Bimrose
3. D. Polkinghorne
4. Fredrick J. Wertz
5. Susan L. Morrow
6. J. Ponterotto
7. H. Levitt
8. L. Hearne

Citations in the corpus

• Ethical Issues in the Use of In-Depth Interviews: Literature Review and Discussion (2009, background): “The first were discussion papers: these discussed ethical issues related to in-depth interviews but were not specifically connected to any research study [1-35].”
• Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. (2005, background): “Although the ethical issues involved in qualitative research are the topic of another article in this issue (Haverkamp, 2005), I wanted to close with a few comments about the ethics of qualitative data collection.”
• Effectively Communicating Qualitative Research (2007, background): “They describe ethical treatment of human participants and note particular ethical challenges (cf. Haverkamp, 2005).”
• Recommendations for Designing and Reviewing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Promoting Methodological Integrity (2017, background): “Instead of institutionalizing rules for authors that locate trustworthiness and rigor solely within set procedures, this approach is intended to promote a process of research design and evaluation that enhances the appreciation of diversity and complexity in qualitative research as well as supports ”
• Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. (2005, background): “Fine (1992) wrote of the importance of " positioning researchers as self-conscious, critical, and participatory analysts, engaged with but still distinct from our informants " (p. 220)—a daunting task (see also Haverkamp, 2005).”
• Resilience and career adaptability: Qualitative studies of adult career counseling (2012, background): “A distinctive ethical dilemma can arise in the situation of dual relationships where there is an imbalance of power between the counselor–researcher and the practitioner–client (Haverkamp, 2005).”