Trust management through reputation mechanisms
By Giorgos Zacharia, Pattie Maes. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 2000
596 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f7914b90097c9dec49c55728a4d422dec5c810a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- An evidential model of distributed reputation management (2002, methodology): “AsoialmehanismofreputationmanagementwasimplementedinKasbah[8,28]whihrequirethatusersgivea ratingforthemselvesandeitherhaveaentralageny(diretratings)orothertrustedusers(ollaborativeratings).”
- Helpful Reviewers in TripAdvisor, an Online Travel Community (2011, background): “Systematic mechanisms calculate reputation based on algorithms that utilize objective information such as duration of the relationship or membership, frequency of participant activities, in addition to ratings by other members, to compute online reputation (Zacharia et al., 2000).”
- Multi-Agent Systems (2017, unknown): “[1], [4] [5], [17], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [26], [30], [31], [34], [38], [40]).”
- Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology (2002, methodology): “This last one has only been tested on a simulated community as opposed to the test we carried on a real one (another example of this tests on simulated communities is Zacharias and Maes [29]).”
- Detecting deception in reputation management (2003, background): “Reputation management is attracting much attention in the multiagent systems community [11, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20].”
- A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents (2008, background): “Reputation-building is a social process dependent on past interactions (and in particular, the degree of honesty that a selling party has demonstrated in those earlier transactions) between consumers and the selling party [141].”