Quantitative synthesis of social psychological research.

By Blair T. Johnson, A. Eagly. 2000

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6f2175f86ceec0cac743ce62198d72055eb19d33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Sumbleen Ali
2. Yaacov Trope
3. R. Rohner
4. T. Pettigrew
5. Nira Liberman
6. D. Oyserman
7. Linda R. Tropp
8. A. Eagly

Citations in the corpus

• Pancultural Gender Differences in the Relation Between Perceived Parental Acceptance and Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adult Offspring (2015, methodology): “To generate a pool of potentially usable studies, we adopted multiple retrieval strategies, as recommended by Johnson and Eagly (2000). These strategies use both electronic databases and manual methods.”
• Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis (2010, background): “Analyses followed both fixed and random effects assumptions (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001) to test whether predictor variables and study features could explain variability in the magnitude of effect sizes (Johnson & Eagly, 2000).”
• How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators (2008, unknown): “We obtained homogeneous samples by use of Johnson’s (1993) DSTAT program.”
• Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. (2003, methodology): “Following Hedges and Olkin’s (1985) procedures (see also Johnson & Eagly, 2000; Lipsey & Wilson, 2001), the gs were converted to ds by correcting them for bias, and each d was weighted by the reciprocal of its variance in the analyses.”
• Parenting Stress in Families of Children With ADHD (2013, methodology): “This is one of the major problems with narrative reviews (Johnson & Eagly, 2000) and one that is rectified using quantitative meta-analytic procedures.”
• Predicting Parenting Stress in Families of Children with ADHD: Parent and Contextual Factors (2010, methodology): “32 For each analysis a Forrest plot was created using CMA and inspected visually for outliers (Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins et al., 2007; Johnson & Eagly, 2000; Lipsey & Wilson, 2001; Sterne & Harbord, 2004.”
• Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review. (2007, methodology): “When means and standard deviations were unavailable, other statistical information (e.g., t- or F-values) was used (Johnson & Eagly, 2000; Lipsey & Wilson, 2001).”
• Self-Concept of Students with Learning Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis (2002, methodology): “As noted by Rosenthal (1995) and Johnson and Eagly (2000), a mean effect size based on a greatly heterogeneous sample of effect sizes is likely to be misleading unless factors accounting for such variability are explained.”
• Another Look at Sex Differences in Preferred Mate Characteristics: The Effects of Endorsing the Traditional Female Gender Role (2002, background): “…female qualities and favorable surface qualities were relatively small, those on the sexism scales and good earning potential were in a range conventionally considered to be moderate to large, and the difference on preferred age could be considered very large (see Johnson & Eagly, 2000).”