Decision-making style : habit, style or both?
By Peter Thunholm. 2004
298 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6ec898f13099727a2a0f0ecbf68d680e268b30cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Shlomit Davidovitch
- L. Asulin-Peretz
- Jozef Bavoľár
- Oľga Orosová
- Michel J. J. Handgraaf
- Elke U. Weber
- Kirstin C Appelt
- Kerry F. Milch
In Social Psychology
- L. Asulin-Peretz
- Reuma Gadassi
- Shlomit Davidovitch
- Jozef Bavoľár
- Oľga Orosová
- Michel J. J. Handgraaf
- Elke U. Weber
- I. Gati
In Sociology and Political Science
- Shlomit Davidovitch
- L. Asulin-Peretz
- Jozef Bavoľár
- Oľga Orosová
- Michel J. J. Handgraaf
- Elke U. Weber
- I. Gati
- Reuma Gadassi
Citations in the corpus
- From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach (2010, methodology): “For example, Scott and Bruce (1995) developed their general decision-making style questionnaire based on Harren’s (1979) typology, which was originally developed for career decisions; indeed, Scott and Bruce’ (1995) typology is used in various decision situations (e.g., Galotti et al., 2006; Thunhol”
- Decision-making styles and their associations with decision-making competencies and mental health (2015, background): “One of the strongest negative relationships was found between the spontaneous and the rational style, a result that has been supported by previous studies (Baiocco, Laghi & D’Alessio, 2009; Thunholm, 2004; Loo, 2000; Gambetti, 2008).”
- The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, background): “Although there is some disagreement as to whether decision style and cognitive style represent the same construct or not (e.g., Mohammed et al., 2007; Mohammed & Schwall, 2009; Thunholm, 2004), they can both be said to assess individuals’ methods of making decisions, or thinking more gen-”