Vegetation-climate feedbacks in a greenhouse world

By F. Woodward, M. Lomas, R. Betts. 1998

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

ENERGY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: Resources, Conversions, Costs, Uses, and Consequences (2000, background): “Although higher atmospheric CO2 levels would have some beneficial consequences for the biosphere (82, 96, 97), attention has been concentrated on possible, and often indefensibly exaggerated, negative impacts.”
Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? (2007, background): “…to global models - revisiting the early functional classifications Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs: Foley et al. 1996; Friend et al. 1997; Woodward et al. 1998, Potter & Klooster 1999, Sitch et al. 2003, Gerten et al. 2004) simulate natural vegetation distribution and terrestrial carbon…”
Endemic species and ecosystem sensitivity to climate change in Namibia (2006, methodology): “The vegetation model used for these simulations is the SDGVM (Woodward et al., 1998, Woodward & Lomas, 2004b).”
Using niche‐based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe (2006, background): “Large-scale dynamic vegetation models have been developed in recent years to link dynamically changes in vegetation through time and space with the carbon and water cycles (e.g. Woodward et al ., 1998; Daly et al ., 2000; Sitch et al ., 2003).”
Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: A mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation (2010, background): “…DNDC, GFDL LM3V, HYBRID, SDGVM) [Friend et al., 1997; Gerber et al., 2010; Miehle et al., 2006; Schimel et al., 1996; Thornton and Rosenbloom, 2005; Woodward et al., 1998], whereas others include a more theoretically correct form of energetics for C cost assessment [Dickinson et al., 2002;…”