Carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: A mechanistic, globally applicable model of plant nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and fixation

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modeling the carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: Mycorrhizal trade‐offs and multipath resistance uptake improve predictions of retranslocation (2014, methodology): “…plant N uptake consumes a substantial proportion of C from net primary production that would otherwise be allocated to growth (globally, 50 Pg C [Fisher et al., 2010]) and in the current terrestrial biosphere models, there is no consideration of dynamic belowground allocation by plants in…”
The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty (2019, methodology): “The Fixation and Uptake of Nitrogen (FUN) model, based on the work of Fisher et al. (2010), Brzostek et al. (2014), and Shi et al. (2016), is incorporated.”
Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study (2015, background): “…controls BNF rates (Gerber et al 2010), whereas phosphorus (P) availability is more important in CASA-CNP (Wang et al 2007, Wang et al 2010, figure 1(c)), and N availability and plant N demand is critical in the fixation and uptake of nitrogen model (FUN; Fisher et al 2010, Brzostek et al 2014).”