Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: a focus on animal welfare

By M. Schröder, M. McEachern. 2004

319 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Plant Science, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e90e86f1e9a51df36019e5e8e4a62833f6e3aee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Diana Gregory‐Smith
2. Andrew Smith
3. Heidi Winklhofer
4. Adamantios Diamantopoulos
5. Marko Sarstedt
6. Christian M. Ringle
7. Paul A. Pavlou
8. Sabrina Helm

Citations in the corpus

• Emotions and dissonance in ‘ethical’ consumption choices (2013, result): “Inconsistent choices and attitude–behaviour gaps of consumers who engage in ethical consumption have also been briefly reported in earlier studies (e.g. Carrigan & Attalla, 2001; De Pelsmacker, Driesen, & Rayp, 2005; Schroder & McEachern, 2004).”
• Ethically Minded Consumer Behavior:Scale Review, Development, and Validation (2016, unknown): “Overlapping animalwelfare and local community issues is the topic of organic food, and indeed many consumers purchase organic food for animal welfare reasons and/or to support their local communities (McEachern et al., 2007; Schröder and McEachern, 2004).”