Management Ownership and Audit Firm Size

By Clive Lennox. 2005

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6e544cfc531c805e56db3caaa5ccfbf78219ac53

Citations in the corpus

• Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners (2009, unknown): “Lennox (2005) , Wang et al. (2006), and Choi and Wong”
• Auditor Choice in Politically Connected Firms (2014, unknown): “Regrettably, Worldscope data limitations prevent us from also integrating auditor dismissals and resignations into the analysis after Lennox and Pittman (2010).”
• Foreign institutional ownership and auditor choice: Evidence from worldwide institutional ownership (2018, unknown): “…by French companies with less family control and more diversified ownership (Francis et al., 2009), by Canadian companies with large differences between cash flow rights and control rights (Khalil et al., 2008), and by UK unlisted firms with either low or high managerial ownership (Lennox, 2005).”
• Auditing private companies: what do we know? (2017, unknown): “…that based on their company-specific characteristics, private companies seem to self-select the most cost-effective auditor.5 For a similar sample, Lennox (2005) focuses on the relationship between auditor choice and management ownership, testing the impact of agency problems between managers and…”